1) Is just flat out false. You can follow every single trade the guy does, in real-time as the trades are put on:
https://www.tastytrade.com/tt/bob-the-trader
2) Not surprising really. I don't believe in mentoring, because most people do not have what it takes to be a trader. What I have found, is that even if they are presented with good information, their lack of skill and cognitive dissonance will over-ride every fact presented to them; because they refuse to embrace discomfort. You could have the Big D himself mentoring someone, and the person turns out to be a colossal failure. As the ol' saying goes, you can publish your best strat on the front cover of the Wall Street Journal, and no one would make money from it, because everyone would want to screw with it and "Tweak it".
3) I don't even understand this point.
4) And? Do you know exactly what she did? I mean, exactly. I do, I read the brief. Personally? It would never happen to me, because reporting any thing other than Net Liq is stupid, from a CLIENT / PARTNER PSYCHOLOGY standpoint. And I have a good Accountant, and a good Lawyer. This is a problem that results from people not having their **$^ together, when it comes to the accounting, legal and SG&A of their Firm. More than just "outright fraud". She got nailed, as well she should (Plus, her strategy was a bit stupid, and subject to drifting into a 'rip-tide' that pulls accounts down). Point being? Those merits can be discussed as traders. I disagree with what she did, would never get caught that way myself, but understand how it happens to people. I don't know what Tom's view is, because I could care less.
5) Again, I don't even understand this point. Tom's strong suit (
even though he claims otherwise) is NOT that he understands things from a Quantitative Basis. He just doesn't. The guy struggles to understand the import of Sharpe Ratio, and the theory behind how it's constructed. I can't even believe they let that video air. Cringe doesn't even begin to describe my reaction. But again, I don't even understand the point. Like, at all. He trade events in, at extremes, and then his standpoint IS contrarian. Everthing else, is trade management. Some of the best traders I know, are "Dems and Does" kinda guys ... who are ... shall we say ... not exactly "heavy" in the IQ department.
6) In that, I agree. He trades what a Partner and I call "Big Book Non-Correlation". He makes out his positive expectancy comes from his risk overlay. I've seen a lot of guys trade that way ... from their quote / stat page, when they have more capital to deploy. To expect retail traders to be able to do that? Is madness.
My point, is what does ANY of that to do, with what is found at
https://www.tastytrade.com/tt/learn