Where would one find this "data"?Long term data of bail bond investing, over 50 years worth, shows a 9 percent return vs liabilty.
Where would one find this "data"?Long term data of bail bond investing, over 50 years worth, shows a 9 percent return vs liabilty.
Good points here this isn't something you could compound, only so much business to go around. I live in a state that has an obscure law that allows investment portfolios to bond, I like that I can make money on it from the investments and also off the bonds. You can still freely trade the portfollio, you have to sign an affidavit once a month saying it still has the same value or more.The key is you last sentence, risk. It's not clear that the risk adjusted return of this investment type is any higher than the risk adjusted return of putting your money in a CD in a bank. People who talk in terms of absolute ROI rather than risk adjusted return are probably both unaware of the concept and being fooled by a big number without fully taking into account the risk that comes with it. Everyone does it when the risk adjusted return is higher than T-bills. Otherwise it's just selecting your own point on the risk aversion/seeking continuum.
You also need an insurance license and a law enforcement background or training. And a existing agent has to sponsor you for 2 years.
Yes it is. I use the invesments in the portfolio, I can still freely trade them. So I make my returns off my investments and profit from the business. The state doesn't hold the investment, you just sign an affidavit every month saying it still has the initial value or more. They give you surety bonds that you post with the Court, I understand how you would think bonding is high risk, but a lot of risk factors are weighed before a bond is posted. All bonds over 15k are fully collateral backed usually by real estate. No cash is posted you use the surety bonds.The point is, you are running a lending business basically earning 10% on your loan portfolio. Certainly higher than a mortgage portfolio but that is because the risk is higher and not sure how collaterlized the "loans" you are making, i.e. unsecured loans.
You are making it sound like you are making 100% return on your "investment" but your risk is 15 times that due to leverage and your capital at risk is $1.5 million. This is not changed just because you perceive the risk is low.
You need to look at this as a business model of making 10% gross returns on your risk capital. Just because you define the risk as low with your statistics does not change the business model and what it is based on. You are running a business service and that is what this is no matter how you want to define it.
You can do both, you can still actively trade it. The state doesn't hold it. You show them proof of value they give you 15x that amount in surety bonds. Once a month you sign a affidavit stating it still has that value or more.Slight details missed from the OP....
This is a non-scalable, high competition business using high leverage. Last time I checked this was Elite Trader not Elite Investor.
Me thinks, writing Iron Condors on Tesla is way less time and just as rewarding...