Good god you are naieve sometimes, i think you are a pretty smart person overall which makes me wonder where crap like this comes from. Social security is most certainly not self funding, infact it is basically the definition of a ponzi scheme, it requires more and more people to keep paying into it in order to remain solvent, why do you think countries all over Europe are taking on all these shady immigrants? The governments of all these countries have written cheques they cant possibly cash, they now need growth in order to survive, and for some reason they think importing people who will be drains on the system is going to bail them out, any elongated flat line in economic growth and the whole house of cards falls apart.
They need new people in order to attempt to keep growing, in order to pay for the cheques the government has already written.
You say its self sustaining if only government would act properly, isnt that the whole point? The government is incapable of saving for a rainy day, and every dime they get their hands on goes right out the door.
At best ppl my age can hope to get a little bit back, once the government has inflated money to the point where its almost nothing, At worst we will get nothing, How can you call social security self sustaining when it requires a bigger and bigger pool of people paying into it in order to survive? That is the very definition of a ponzi shceme.
If anyone in the private sector pulled the shit the government is doing with social security they would be in jail.
Tell me something piezoe, if you believe social security is self sustaining, do you believe it is possible for them to pay out what is owed without growth, and inflation?
Thanks to the persistent disinformation campaign fomented by Wall Street, and repeated ad infinitum by Republican Congressmen and Senators, you are in agreement with roughly fifty percent of the population. I'd say the Wall Street campaign, has been quite a success story so far.
I don't know about any Ponzi schemes that were based on actuarial calculations. Was Madoff's???
If you want to understand how Social Security is designed to work, the Social Security Administration has reams of informational material on their website.
You asked, "if I believe social security is self sustaining, do I believe it is possible for them to pay out what is owed without growth, and inflation?"
That's a fair question and deserves a fair answer. Without growth of the contributions via interest earned, the answer is "no." Without growth in the number of people of working age relative to the number of retired, the answer is "yes." Actually the answer is "yes. of course!" (If Social Security really were a Ponzi scheme, the answer would be "no".) But the system will require higher and higher levels of contribution as the number of participants shrinks, causing the actuarial risk to be spread over fewer participants. In the limit, as the population shrinks, the contribution rate required approaches that required by a private, individual retirement plan. Can the pay out continue without inflation? Again the answer is "yes".
I can't blame you for not understanding the trade-offs associated with public and private retirement plans. After all, you're fed a steady stream of bullshit by the media and Wall Street. I think I did a fair job of explaining these trade-offs in my post. It might be worth your time to read again, carefully, what I wrote.
To understand social security and how it can possibly work without being a Ponzi scheme, you have to understand that those whose leave the system, through death or for other reasons, without drawing benefits sacrifice nearly their entire contribution. Those who die actuarially young, by leaving their residual benefits in the System, subsidize those who die actuarially old.