If you wish to ignore massive evidence, none of which has been heard in court yet, that is your idiotic purview.
What evidence am I ignoring?
If you wish to ignore massive evidence, none of which has been heard in court yet, that is your idiotic purview.
It'll be clear once you put this thinking cap on.What evidence am I ignoring?
No discussion can ensue without your stipulation that the election is being stolen by The Democrats.What evidence am I ignoring?
So, no discussion until others agree that your unsubstantiated guesses are facts ... LMAO.No discussion can ensue without your stipulation that the election is being stolen by The Democrats.
No discussion can ensue without your stipulation that the election is being stolen by The Democrats.
Trump Won Big.
Get over it.
They understand the concepts just fine, they're playing to the mouth breathing base for political gain.Only a court (Judge) determines what is admissible, and relevant evidence; not the lawyers. The mere allegation that "I HAVE EVIDENCE!!" doesn't make it so.
But even before the evidence question; one first needs standing.
Only clown-attorneys bring cases with no proper evidence, into courts while having no proper standing.
But I'd expect no less from team Trump. And I'd never expect the Trump cult to understand these concepts.
Trump finding out how many people really give a shit about him on his way out haha....