I think sir you way overestimated the Federal taxes he needs to pay.https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/a...ing-on-500-000-a-year-in-income-can-seem-hard
If you are too lazy to read, the gist of the article is "people with an income of 500k are doing ok" and they should have nothing to complain about (the underlying implication is that we can safely raise taxes on that stratum).
Here is a rough breakdown of the budget for one of my coworkers who roughly takes home that much. First, Uncle Sam (Federal, State, City) takes his 35-45 percent, leaving him with roughly 300 grand. Private school for his two kids is probably anywhere from 60 to 100 thousand a year (not sure where they go, but more if it's a "good place" like the Lycée Français de New York). Then you have the mortgage (let's say 60k a year) and the maintenance/taxes on the property (another 25-30) which now he can't even deduct from his taxes (unlike cocaine, a legitimate business expense that he's not even trying to deduct). Before you know it, he's left with 150k to live on and the New York City is pretty FUCKING EXPENSIVE. This is before he set a single penny aside for his retirement. He certainly does not feel rich or even well-off.
The other bit that the author is forgetting is how fleeting the success is in almost every business. There was a study that about 10% of people reach the top 1% by income at least once in their lives. If you can't set aside much in those years, it really sucks.
Assuming he has a mortgage of ~$750K @ 4.5% rate, his itemized deduction will be approximately $33K so his adjusted Federal Gross will be ~$460K and his total Federal tax will be ~$110K, not the $200K you assumed. So, he has ~$390K to spend, not the $300K you wrote. Of course living in NYC he has to pay state tax and city tax which I don't have a clue.
