I have never seen a better trader than

Quote from JT47319:

MM's approach is significantly different from the majority here, I would imagine. From the look of things, its really a fundamental investor approach.

See that neat little logo at the top? Its EliteTRADER. I don't need to know what the company does or how its financials are doing. I only need to know if its trending or if its ranging between identifiable, and therefore exploitable, points.

MM is an investor, not a trader.

Actually all of my initial screens are based on quantitative momentum modeling. Which uses highly analytical and mathematical tools to assess price momentum and the stability of the momentum. This has nothing to do with fundamentals.

Once I narrow down my database of candidates, that's when I use the fundamental skills I honed when I was an MBA student at Wharton.

So you see, my model is actually a hybrid of sorts and I think that's what has made it so successful.

Call me whatever you like...trader..investor.
 
ok. how about LIAR!!

liar, liar, liar.

you don't have consecutive profitable trades, b/c you don't include your losing positions. You don't close your losers, so they don't exist to you.

you are also not ernie, and not an mba.

you're a yahoo message board group person.

lets call a spade a spade here.

JJ

ps good to see you back here!
 
Quote from mrmarket:



Actually all of my initial screens are based on quantitative momentum modeling. Which uses highly analytical and mathematical tools to assess price momentum and the stability of the momentum. This has nothing to do with fundamentals.

Once I narrow down my database of candidates, that's when I use the fundamental skills I honed when I was an MBA student at Wharton.

So you see, my model is actually a hybrid of sorts and I think that's what has made it so successful.

Call me whatever you like...trader..investor.

That is a good description of a front half.
I mean you get candidates. you do fundamentals.

Tell us about the parts you have that follow this beginning stuff.

Do youever assess how you are improving using the front you described. The middle not described and the back end not described.

Do you have feedback loops from the various parts back into this hybrid front end?

What is the frequency of your self assessment program?
 
Quote from jack hershey:



That is a good description of a front half.
I mean you get candidates. you do fundamentals.

Tell us about the parts you have that follow this beginning stuff.

Do youever assess how you are improving using the front you described. The middle not described and the back end not described.

Do you have feedback loops from the various parts back into this hybrid front end?

What is the frequency of your self assessment program?

Jack,

I have a full time job and 3 little kids. I save the scorekeeping for my hardcore followers on my Yahoo site.
 
Quote from Jesse J.:

ok. how about LIAR!!

liar, liar, liar.

you don't have consecutive profitable trades, b/c you don't include your losing positions. You don't close your losers, so they don't exist to you.

you are also not ernie, and not an mba.

you're a yahoo message board group person.

lets call a spade a spade here.

JJ

ps good to see you back here!


If this is going to be another personal attack forum, then I'm outta here. Actually, I'm kind of surprised that we almost made it through one day of civility. Nice chatting with you guys again. Have a nice life.
 
"Civility"??:confused:

The title of this trend:
"I have never seen a better trader than"

Maybe you should heed your own advice regarding etiquette and civility.
 
Quote from mrmarket:



Actually all of my initial screens are based on quantitative momentum modeling. Which uses highly analytical and mathematical tools to assess price momentum and the stability of the momentum. This has nothing to do with fundamentals.

Once I narrow down my database of candidates, that's when I use the fundamental skills I honed when I was an MBA student at Wharton.

In that case, I'm sorry to hear all that's not working out too well for you.
 
Back
Top