Quote from gms:
You had written on your site, in response to the emails, that you didn't keep track of your losers. Now you appear to have done so. Flip flop. My math was based on the amount of missing trades your fan reported at that time, not your new revised figures you've given in your new flip flop post.
The amount of members on your site is meaningless. Firstly, there is no method to document any of them them as being ET members; you're citing them as so is baseless. You're assuming that your recent activity on ET is responsible for new memberships on your site. Your site basically is about you and offers very little else, it stands to reason that anyone more knowledgeable than you would not be signing on as a member. Anyone that would be interested by such a subject are people faring worse than you, hoping to learn something from your performance, hoping that such membership in your site leads somehow to an improvement of their trades, though I haven't seen any evidence of any such content.
Secondly, members register and they come and go, many without without deleting their accounts after they've lost interest. The 481 most probably does not reflect current "active" membership. Losing interest is easy to do on a site with little content.
Face the facts. I don't make this stuff up. I've had a loyal following for quite some time. The reason for this is that I've been incredibly successful. If I were being untruthful in any of my claims, wouldn't you think people in that Yahoo Group, or The Motley Fool would have recognized this by now? If you insist on calling me a liar, I won't want to post on ET anymore. Although I think your analysis is flawed, and your opinions don't mesh with mine, I never called you a liar.
You have to realize that there are some people that reside under the right hand tail of the normal standard deviation curve. They are superior in their intelligence, physical appearance, stock picking ability and athletic ability. I'll have you know that it's a very nice place to be.