I have bought Al Brooks' Trading Course

dratsum said:
Brooks has written many books. Pick any of them. Pick something you believe is incorrect or too vague to be useful or otherwise supports your allegations in your Al Brooks – Al Crooks, Charlatan topic.

Post the page number and name of the book. I might learn something out of the necessity of having to explain whatever it is you choose means to me.
More...

I never said "Al Brooks is a charlatan because he promises x and y occurs at a higher probability than x". My opinion that people that conflate trading analysis with teaching people how to trade is purely subjective and contingent upon individual experience. Right now it seems like you have no individual experience to share and are trolling for Brooks.
 
Q3D said:
My opinion that people that conflate trading analysis with teaching people how to trade is purely subjective and contingent upon individual experience.
More...

Brooks is the antithesis of subjectiveness. His writings are full of innovative ways to count aspects of the most objective and logical components imaginable.

Your opportunity to discuss what Brooks has written is over. You're back on ignore.
 
dratsum said:
Brooks is the antithesis of subjectiveness. His writings are full of innovative ways to count aspects of the most objective and logical components imaginable.

Your opportunity to discuss what Brooks has written is over. You're back on ignore.
More...

Why would there be a bull side and a bear side, with the probabilities roughly 60-40 to 50-50 at all times if Brooks' teachings consisted of "the most objective and logical components imaginable."

Based on your description we can infer that you're suggesting Brooks' trading analysis sans execution teachings could be coded into a computer trading program to executive profitably and consistently. Why haven't "most objective and logical Al Brooks" algorithms been constructed and implemented on the markets?
 
dratsum said:
Brooks has written many books. Pick any of them. Pick something you believe is incorrect or too vague to be useful or otherwise supports your allegations in your Al Brooks – Al Crooks, Charlatan topic.

Post the page number and name of the book. I might learn something out of the necessity of having to explain whatever it is you choose means to me.
More...

Hi, which of his 4 books is good to start with? Any special order to read, and is there any overlapping material? Thanks.
 
steven21 said:
Hi, which of his 4 books is good to start with? Any special order to read, and is there any overlapping material? Thanks.
More...
It's best to read Brooks in any manner you choose without any outside input as to how to proceed. I don't mean that flippantly. Start anywhere. I believe that's better than allowing my or someone elses expectations enter into this process. If something isn't immediately interesting move to another spot. Most pages have something worth dwelling on for a longtime. The only thing I would caution you on is reading anyone elses opinion about brooks ...while you're studying brooks. It does more harm than good. His work is self-explanatory.
 
dratsum said:
It's best to read Brooks in any manner you choose without any outside input as to how to proceed. I don't mean that flippantly. Start anywhere. I believe that's better than allowing my or someone elses expectations enter into this process. If something isn't immediately interesting move to another spot. Most pages have something worth dwelling on for a longtime. The only thing I would caution you on is reading anyone elses opinion about brooks ...while you're studying brooks. It does more harm than good. His work is self-explanatory.
More...

You're giving someone an opinion on Brooks and telling them not to listen to anyone's opinion on Brooks. That's not very logical or objective of you.

What you're covertly trying to say is don't listen to negativity about Brooks, right?
 
Q3D said:
You're giving someone an opinion on Brooks and telling them not to listen to anyone's opinion on Brooks. That's not very logical or objective of you.

What you're covertly trying to say is don't listen to negativity about Brooks, right?
More...

1) What do you think about Visaria positive experience so far with Al Brooks education material considering this is his thread about his experience with the content ?

2) Did you study the same video course as Visaria ?

I don't expect you to answer the above questions considering you have refuse so far to answer any prior serious questions about Al Brooks content which makes it very suspicious about your agenda in this thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top