Hi all,
Ok, on many forums I see many posters state 400:1 leverage is trading career suicide.
Why is this?
My assumption is that 400:1 leverage destroys the undisciplined traders and the newbies because they go for the big trade and get their account eaten up by a simple few pip swing in the opposite direction.
But, with an account balance of 10K, with proper money management, is there still a difference of trading a 10k lot at 400:1 (margin $25) vs. a 10k lot at 2:1 (margin $5000) with a stoploss at say 20 pips and a target at 20 pips.... The resulting loss or profit will remain the same amount of dollars no matter what the choosen leverage is... since the account balance is the same either leveraged account, lot size consistant, can loose the same amount of pips before blowup.
So, do posters advise to stay away from 400:1 because it temps newbies at big profits for little investment at a extreme greater risk??
Thx!
-Prop
Ok, on many forums I see many posters state 400:1 leverage is trading career suicide.
Why is this?
My assumption is that 400:1 leverage destroys the undisciplined traders and the newbies because they go for the big trade and get their account eaten up by a simple few pip swing in the opposite direction.
But, with an account balance of 10K, with proper money management, is there still a difference of trading a 10k lot at 400:1 (margin $25) vs. a 10k lot at 2:1 (margin $5000) with a stoploss at say 20 pips and a target at 20 pips.... The resulting loss or profit will remain the same amount of dollars no matter what the choosen leverage is... since the account balance is the same either leveraged account, lot size consistant, can loose the same amount of pips before blowup.
So, do posters advise to stay away from 400:1 because it temps newbies at big profits for little investment at a extreme greater risk??
Thx!
-Prop
