"I don't even know where the computers are" - Wheeler, yesterday's right wing hero

[exGOPer]

here are some quotes... again.

This is the image on top of your Fox News link

That's Wheeler who made shit up and admitted it is hoax

Why would anyone believe rest of the story if Fox News won't retract the hoax parts?

 

[exGOPer]

here are some quotes... again.

Second line in your article

"Rod Wheeler, a retired Washington homicide detective and Fox News contributor investigating the case on behalf of the Rich family, made the WikiLeaks claim, which was corroborated by a federal investigator who spoke to Fox News."

First, Wheeler isn't retired - he was fired

Second, he isn't investigating on behalf of Rich's family - he is investigating on behalf of another Fox News consultant.

Third, notice the third line "which was corroborated by a federal investigator who spoke to Fox News"

How can there be corroboration if Wheeler's version itself is a hoax.

Explain that!

 

[jem]

the mediate story was from november and it shows fox cares about its integrity.
the rest of what you wrote is a deflection away from the fact you can't support the bullshit you wrote.

Fox said multiple times it has spoke to the federal law enforcement source.

I already proved that parts of Fox News story is a hoax - see the other thread.

The original Fox News story used Wheeler as it's source - now Wheeler says he was using Fox News as a source. Why would I believe Fox News version of things when they won't even issue a retraction for the Wheeler part?

And here is proof that Fox makes up non existent FBI source

www.mediaite.com/online/bret-baier-apologizes-for-mistake-in-reporting-clinton-fbi-story/

Done

 

[jem]

1. he said the family hired him and signed the paperwork but he got a small payment for a third party.. so you got that wrong.

2. here are the quotes... in which fox says the fbi source said something.

prove that fox did not speak to the Federal Law enforcement source...


stop bullshiting and think.

you keep making statements that never hold up... there was a source that spoke with Fox according to fox.

I have underlined statements which reporter's use when they identify the source of their info.

An FBI forensic report of Rich's computer -- generated within 96 hours after Rich's murder -- showed he made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time, the federal source told Fox News.

“I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.

(then the article says this is consistent with Wheeler...

then it says...)

The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...contact-with-wikileaks-investigator-says.html

 

[exGOPer]

the mediate story was from november and it shows fox cares about its integrity.
the rest of what you wrote is a deflection away from the fact you can't support the bullshit you wrote.

Fox said multiple times it has spoke to the federal law enforcement source.

If Fox cares about it's integrity then why haven't they retracted the Wheeler parts from the story you linked after it was proven as a hoax?

 

[exGOPer]

here are the quotes... in which fox says the fbi source said something.

prove that fox did not speak to the Federal Law enforcement source...


stop bullshiting and think.

Again

" "which was corroborated by a federal investigator who spoke to Fox News"""

Fox said they spoke to Wheeler and then corroborated it with a Federal Investigator

Wheeler admitted he was making shit up - still your story has the line 'corroborated'

Second, Fox has in the past made up story about FBI sources as I already linked and only corrected it DAYS AFTER, why would anyone believe when them.

 

[jem]

stick to the main subject in your posts and then address the off point.
prove fox did not speak with a federal law enforcement officer.

shall I give you the quotes again...
are are you going to admit you have nothing but made up shit.

If Fox cares about it's integrity then why haven't they retracted the Wheeler parts from the story you linked after it was proven as a hoax?

 

[exGOPer]

stick to the main subject in you posts and they address the off point.
prove fox did not speak with a federal law enforcement officer.

shall I give you the quotes again...
are are you going to admit you have nothing but made up shit.

I already proved that parts of the Fox News story is a hoax within a day.

I already proved that Fox News has lied about FBI sources in the past and only corrected it after MANY DAYS of not correcting it.

Shall I give you the links again? All you are doing is linking to a story that are proven to be complete hoax in parts WITHIN a SINGLE day - why would anyone believe the rest of them are true when they have a history of lying. Fox News quotes don't mean shit, they have been already exposed as liars.

Bottomline - If their named sources are lying and making things up - why would anyone believe their unnamed sources?

 

[jem]

look on the first page of this thread...

you said fox news was quoting wheeler.
I said Fox was also quoting and Federal Law enforcement source.
I gave you the quotes...
you were dead ass wrong...

now you are doubting fox... fine.

but you were bullshitting your ass off..
they were not just quoting wheeler.

 

[exGOPer]

look on the first page of this thread...

you said fox news was quoting wheeler.
I said Fox was also quoting and Federal Law enforcement source.
I gave you the quotes...
you were dead ass wrong...

now you are doubting fox... fine.

but you were bullshitting your ass off..
they were not just quoting wheeler.

Again - as I have already pointed out - the original local Fox story that led to the national Fox story is based on Wheeler saying he talked to an FBI source.

Secondly, the Fox story you keep reporting has been exposed as a hoax.

Why would I believe that there is a second Fox News source when the first one never existed.

Nobody is buying your bullshit, if this was NYT that got one line wrong - you would dismiss the entire thing as fake news.

But it's Fox News where half of the story is PROVEN to be FAKE and the other half UNCLEAR and UNTRACEABLE, you are still hanging on to the BS.

Lastly, FBI is not investigating Seth Rich in anyway, how can there be a FBI source in the first place.