Interestingly you continue your spineless noncommital.
How many hours "can" you spend in the position of President would you estimate?
I am officially running for POTUS as a Democrat in 2024
- Thread starter kmgilroy89
- Start date
How many hours "can" you spend in the position of President would you estimate?
Up to 24 hours in a single day depending on the circumstances. What you need to understand is that the President can only do so much himself in terms of moving the country forward. They can't write legislation and need a willing Congress. I will encourage Congress to get as much done as possible. I will layout a full agenda in time and even that is subject to be significantly modified as the facts change. I'm not an ideologue.
Do you have a message that you would like to leave with the voters?
Yes, a lot of voters need to stop thinking they know more than they do. Voters need to be more open that they're completely wrong about what they think they know. They have to be open to the idea that what society currently is doesn't have to be this way. A lot of beliefs that people have are quite frankly based on bullshit. I think a lot of people believe things, because some person they respect told them it was true or out of a form of tribalism. It's not, because they were seriously considering all the alternatives. However, you should question everyone, including what your own intuition says. If you're very honest with yourself, you would probably admit that your intuition has been proven wrong before.
Well, thank you for your views.
It is plain to see that you are truly a compasionate people person with a firm grasp on how to charm your audience and the voting population at large.
Surely we can expect to see you on the election trail in proportion commensurate with your skills and abilities.
Good Luck Sir.
So you will be the intuition for the people?
"...Voters need to be more open that they're completely wrong about what they think they know..."
You mean how voters don't know how they feel about abortion, and it should be up to the government to tell them what they know?
Jesus. You're IBM, dude. You will never be Apple.
I bet that even if I vote for you, Mr. IBM, I will still not get my flying car. I want my fucking flying car!
You deserve points for honesty, but this approach of telling voters they're stupid, and you know what's best for them has been tried before and again without much success. Maybe this time it's different?
What is your position on the way forward concerning the status of Ray Epps in the January 6 prosecutions. Are you satisfied with the way things are or would you support any changes?
Background:
Last edited:
I don't know who Ray Epps is. Furthermore, I would advise against watching Tucker Carlson. He has made his fortune pumping up dishonest propaganda. He is not interested in the truth, only bits he can use to further his narrative. Whenever he puts something out there you should question what details he's intentionally leaving out to promote his agenda. As an example, the other day he dishonestly used the sale of oil in our national reserves to promote a Hunter Biden-China corruption narrative. It's known full well how the oil is sold (it's done at auction) and the Chinese company was legitimately the highest bidder. As you know, humans are capped with a limited amount of this commodity: time. When I watch Tucker I know I'm watching somebody who's not interested in getting the truth out to people so not only do I have to watch him, but I have to look for counter arguments against him, because he's so well known for intentionally misleading the public. In other words, I find watching him to be a massive waste of time that doesn't help me further my pursuit of what's true.
What's true concerning the January 6 jailing criteria?