Quote from daddy'sboy:
JSHINV
Ok, covered call is synthetic equivalent of naked put, just in case you weren't aware. So, cc's aren't a good strategy to use if you are trying to avoid "naked" positions.
daddy's boy
Quote from JSHINV:
Like I said in my first post, I usually avoid these public boards. I am going back to my past practice. I do appreciate the constructive comments from the other posters, however.
Goodbye.
"JSHINV
Ok, covered call is synthetic equivalent of naked put, just in case you weren't aware. So, cc's aren't a good strategy to use if you are trying to avoid "naked" positions.
daddy's boy"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I usually buy an out of the money put to cover it. But, I am learning this approach is not a strategy I like and really not a good strategy at all when compared to equivalent alternatives."
Quote from JSHINV:
Like I said in my first post, I usually avoid these public boards. I am going back to my past practice. I do appreciate the constructive comments from the other posters, however.
Goodbye.
"JSHINV
Ok, covered call is synthetic equivalent of naked put, just in case you weren't aware. So, cc's aren't a good strategy to use if you are trying to avoid "naked" positions.
daddy's boy"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I usually buy an out of the money put to cover it. But, I am learning this approach is not a strategy I like and really not a good strategy at all when compared to equivalent alternatives."
Quote from MTE:
JSHINV,
Sounds like you didn't like daddy'sboy comment about a covered call being the same as a naked put. Well, whether you like it or not this is the case, the two are identical.
So anyone who says he/she doesn't like naked short option positions, but is ok with covered calls is fooling him/herself.