Who are you, Paramhansa Yogananda? Jeez.
Just someone who can't admit when he is wrong and always needs to have the last word.
The thing is he probably still believes he's right.
Who are you, Paramhansa Yogananda? Jeez.
Just someone who can't admit when he is wrong and always needs to have the last word.
The thing is he probably still believes he's right.
Damn and here I thought I had a definable edge.And there are thousands of retail traders trading on breakouts with "confirmation". This is not an edge.
It's not my theory it's Wyckoff's 3 Law's.Sure, but price is a lagging indicator. What is your theory behind by a price at point A leads to a specific price or direction at point B?
Sorry Elon... I'm not sure how to provide any proof.Yeah and I'm Elon Musk... it's not hard to claim success on the internet anonymously, I'd rather see the proof in your argument.
Could be or maybe I'm just lucky.So maybe your success has to do with capturing beta while reducing negative alpha through drawdown reduction. You don't need Wyckoff for that.
It has been working for me. Actually has high correlation to SPX as it is mainly a long strategy and it does keep drawdowns to a minimum.Not sure how much faith I would put in a plan unless it is a strategy based upon signals with high information ratios, low correlation to SPX, and minimal drawdowns (the trifecta!).
%%@curiosity,
Since your strategy is short term, volatility matters and it's all about trend. If it's volatile, a smaller stop loss will not work. Next, what to use to spot for trend? This is much debatable and some swear by 50 SMA. You have to do the experiment yourself. For a start, look how well it is staying above the moving average. How to get a good sense of the overall market? The good and hard way is to look at many charts. It's all hard work and patient.







Wyckoff’s 3 laws are just simple supply and demand dynamics (market function). I think attributing the idea that changes in supply or demand impact price is kind of funny considering this is a very old concept.It's not my theory it's Wyckoff's 3 Law's.
So you’re getting beta with drawdown reduction. That’s a good strategy for buy & hold but is not a trading strategy, per se.It has been working for me. Actually has high correlation to SPX as it is mainly a long strategy and it does keep drawdowns to a minimum.
%%..... I thought I had a definable edge.
Could be or maybe I'm just lucky.
It has been working for me. Actually has high correlation to SPX as it is mainly a long strategy and it does keep drawdowns to a minimum.





I am not interested in day trading.
But I am interested in swing or positional trading.
I have an account with TD ameritrade.
I want clean chart with minimum indicators. I usually choose following
1. Volume /2. 21 EMA /3. RSI /4. ADX
Please suggest more if you think they are imp.
What is your opinion about indicators from Anna coulling and Wyckoff VSA package from tradeguider?
It may be an old concept but it is what I believe drives the market.Wyckoff’s 3 laws are just simple supply and demand dynamics (market function). I think attributing the idea that changes in supply or demand impact price is kind of funny considering this is a very old concept.
This is where we seem to differ. I don't need a theory about what is driving the market. I only need to know that the market is moving and a method of getting out of my position if it stops moving or reverses.Your takeaway from it though should be that on a chart all you see if ex-post data. So you need to have a theory about what is driving supply or demand for the stock ex-ante (in the future). This would be catalyst like ratings changes by a bulge bracket or influential analyst, improving macro conditions & risk sentiment, or expectation of a product that will expand TAM, etc. Assuming supply remains the same, the impact to liquidity by the demand shock will push the price up, etc.