Jack,you say that sensing becomes the inference while sleeping.This is what i`ve sensed while i was sleeping(pic).It`s an electrodynamic lantern.QWhat was that supposed to mean?I was trying to sense the volume pieces!
Quote from outsource100:
Jack,you say that sensing becomes the inference while sleeping.This is what i`ve sensed while i was sleeping(pic).It`s an electrodynamic lantern.QWhat was that supposed to mean?I was trying to sense the volume pieces!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Quote from frenchfry:
Just continue. Looks "terrific" so far. Post questions if they come up in specific areas.
Hitch? Here my memory immediately reminds me of this: "...10 price cases...8 of them are internals..."Quote from jeredlbb:
.. In fact I am unclear how to handle a 'Hitch'. I would say that it is not an 'Internal" so that is how I am handling it thus far. ie No 'Wait'.
Now, how about on the chart? Does it get boxed in? Does it have a specific color?
Quote from frenchfry:
This is a tricky one. On Jack's reference chart it looks like bar 29 is indeed treated/defined as a XR and not as lat4. But... if you look in his log for that day... and here I'm assuming I looked at the correct one... then there is no entry for a Lat3 or 4 or anything like "retro".
It all boils down to how do you degap and what the resulting formation is after you degap. If we had better charts or tools then there would be no discussion.
When I degap mentally then I get this sequence:
Bar 26 = XB
Bar 27 = FBP (after degap)
Bar 28 = Lat3 (in case I would have to do a retro then this bar would be a FTP after degap)
Bar 29 = Lat4 (because after degaping all previous bars it is still in the boundaries of bar 26)
However according to Jack's instructions we do a "retro" after a lat4(see instructions earlier in this thread). Then bar 29 would become a XR.
Here you need to check with Jack because in the past I remember that the instruction to me was to do a "retro" only after lat7. Retro means we stop to treat all the bars which are part of the lateral as internal bars but we treat it as a sub fractal/sub sequence and we go in the log to the beginning of the lateral and treat all the bars as "normal" formations.
Please ask Jack. But you see, it all boils down to how you degap the bars.