Interestingly I have never seen PFP, FPF and PEP before. The names for the eleven volume elements that he used before are:Quote from outsource100:
What comes up,i asked for already.And for the purpose of this thread,we`d need to finish with the log`s headers and its definitions.
Sec Cat Case Form Squ Arrows Not T2F Not Event PFP FPF PEP P3P T2P T2F
I can`t type the definitions which i know nothing about
I'm doing the first step to point out inconsistencies or errors. It is up to Jack to decide if my point of view is correct or not.Quote from outsource100:
Don`t say it.Correct it.I knew that some of the Jack`s documents would be scandalous.If you`ll find any mistakes,please correct it and post it.
Quote from frenchfry:
I'm doing the first step to point out inconsistencies or errors. It is up to Jack to decide if my point of view is correct or not.
Sometimes I am right and he corrects his error(s). But sometimes he pulls another rabbit out of his hat and shows/proves to me what I didn't notice when I made my false assumption.
But have a look at those bars yourself. If you degap them, what do you get?
I'm looking forward to see your "bar degapper" for Ninjatrader. Then there will be no doubt anymore.
.We`ve scheduled to do it,but cancelled since i didn`t have enough info on other stuff as channels,volume/price matrix.We`ve resolved the volume/price matrix issue,but stuck with the channel logic.Stepans code seems not bad,but it`s closed to be viewed.I have no idea about its logic,neither do the Pro.I won`t be able to use it over de-gapped template.The problem is, when the session and bars will be de-gapped,every indicator should be re-coded to fit that template.As soon as i get the channels logic i`ll ask the Pro to do the coding.Quote from frenchfry:
Interestingly I have never seen PFP, FPF and PEP before. The names for the eleven volume elements that he used before are:
"...Here are the 11 expression names which you have been using: P1, T1, P2, T2P, T2F, Not T2P, Not T2F, Not Not T2P, Not Not T2F, P3F and P3P..."
Quote from frenchfry:
Don't know if Jack will check everything but what how do you call a formation where the high of both bars is the same but the low of the second bar is lower than the on of the first bar?
Look at bar 7 and 18.