Quote from newwurldmn:
if i were you and you wanted to do this strategy i would be doing buywriting and selling upside calls. you will be receiving less premium, but you will have a more balanced (up/down exposure) and receive some theta.
Quote from hajimow:
Thanks for your feedback. That was one of my strategies but guess what? I cannot do it in 401K account. My 401k broker (Fidelity) does not let me do Call spread. I was on the phone with them this morning and asked them why they don't allow this strategy in 401k (cash)account ? My short call is covered by my long call so nothing should happen. You see, I have many restrictions in my 401K. That is why my performance is no way close to my regular trading account.
Quote from newwurldmn:
At a place I used to work where they had restrictions on personal trading. Buy-writing was okay (it was considered investing), buying calls of sufficient maturity were okay; selling puts (even if covered) was considered speculative and covered callspreads were also considered speculative. Often these rules seem arbitrary.
I assume you have to be covered on your put sales. (that is you have to have enough cash to fund the purchase of spy's if you are exercised. If so, then your returns will probably be better if you sell upside cals and stay long stock. The amount you lose on the vol difference will be more than made up in the delta you capture on the upsides.
Quote from hajimow:
Yes I can sell cash covered PUT but this is what I don't understand:
You say buying underlying and selling call is more profitable than selling cash covered PUT? I thought they should be the same as buying underlying plus covered call is synthetic short PUT. The disadvantage of buying the underlying and selling Call is that you pay two commisions vs selling cash covered put that you pay just one commission.