I advise Trump to be nice and talk directly to the american people tonight.

Hang on a second, Ricter. You're saying that Trump appointing a justice to the SCOTUS in his Presidential term is the equivalent to pushing a process to increase the number of justices beyond 9 in order to gain a majority?
I think packing is the wrong term for what Biden MIGHT do. It's expanding.
Packing is increasing the density of one bias (over the others) in the same space, like what McConnell is doing.

Going above 9 is not to gain a majority, there is already a majority, and if public opinion polls are to be believed it is a non-representative majority.

As for my Bible thumpers part, I was referring to all the courts, not just scotus.
 
Yeah, I mean he doesn't seem to get that defending himself against and attacking an 80 yo frail man is not a good look.
You mean the "80-year-old frail man" who jogs and rides a bike, meanwhile Trump needs help going down a lightly-sloping ramp and needs both hands to drink from a small bottle of water? You mean that guy?
 
You mean the "80-year-old frail man" who jogs and rides a bike, meanwhile Trump needs help going down a lightly-sloping ramp and needs both hands to drink from a small bottle of water? You mean that guy?

Hey now, it was a glass of water, not a bottle. Those can be tricky!
 
Yes, it landed in congress like a dud and it went nowhere, as it should have.

Yet... the concept keeps coming up again.

"The central provision of the bill would have granted the president power to appoint an additional justice to the U.S. Supreme Court, up to a maximum of six, for every member of the court over the age of 70 years and 6 months."

How many Supreme Court Justices are currently over the age of 70 year and 6 months? This conceptual proposal which was driven in the most detail by FDR -- keeps coming up over and over. What is the modern criteria that would be proposed for allowing additional justices to be added to the court - I doubt whether any proposal from Democrats in 2021 would be based on "we felt like it".
 
I think packing is the wrong term for what Biden MIGHT do. It's expanding.
Packing is increasing the density of one bias (over the others) in the same space, like what McConnell is doing.

Going above 9 is not to gain a majority, there is already a majority, and if public opinion polls are to be believed it is a non-representative majority.

As for my Bible thumpers part, I was referring to all the courts, not just scotus.

I agree it is what Biden might do, but I don't understand why he can't clarify his position. This is one of the biggest things holding me up from crossing the aisle.

We can argue semantics, but the term being used is "packing the courts".
 
Back
Top