Thanks, its what I thought.Ideally, yes and some recommend using 252 trading days instead of calendar days.
Thanks, its what I thought.Ideally, yes and some recommend using 252 trading days instead of calendar days.
Hey @Kevin Schmit, I demand an explanation and an apology.a) is the price of a double-no-touch, formulas available online or in books (e.g. Haug)
b) and c) are the ratios of two binaries, converted to percentages. You can approximate a binary with a very narrow vert, which will go to the binary price in the limit as the distance between strikes goes to zero.
For a little extra accuracy, price the above undiscounted (that is assume RFR of 0%).
Ignore any replies by Quanto, he's a multi-nick imbecile.

Eat it! 
Quanto, I hate to be trite using a decades old cliche..... but you're the type of guy that when asked what time it is..... responds with how the watch was built. And then wants to argue about it.One needs to know also the timeframe (ie. DTE) as well,
b/c for example in t=1y more is possible than in t=1d .
Also volatility (= stddev * 100) has to be supplied with such questions.
Ie. as said, the data in the question is incomplete.
You'll never beat the market using the analytical side of your brain.Quanto, I hate to be trite using a decades old cliche..... but you're the type of guy that when asked what time it is..... responds with how the watch was built. And then wants to argue about it.
Fine tune that a little. You'll do better. Park the the neuro-synapsis's and let a little real world fresh air and walking around sense waft its way into the basement.
Quanto, I hate to be trite using a decades old cliche..... but you're the type of guy that when asked what time it is..... responds with how the watch was built. And then wants to argue about it.
Fine tune that a little. You'll do better. Park the the neuro-synapsis's and let a little real world fresh air and walking around sense waft its way into the basement.