Hypocrisy and debt: Budget deal will continue the spending surplus an hour ago

Hypocrisy and debt: Budget deal will continue the spending surplus

BY SEN. RAND PAUL

Debt, debt, everywhere and not a dollar to spare.” The Tea Party won on a message that our mounting debt was a threat to our very security. And yet . . . when push came to shove, the debt grew - and hypocrisy replaced promise.

Hypocrites, hypocrites . . . who are the greatest hypocrites of all? The search need not be lengthy. Washington abounds with hypocrites of all stripes. Republicans? To be sure. Democrats? To be sure.

Both parties deserve equal parts of the blame, because they both want to spend more. The Republicans clamor for more military spending. The Democrats say, “Ok, but only if you give us more welfare spending.” And the sorry, rotten, corrupt bargain goes on. And the debt roars upward, unabated, passing $20 trillion with no end in sight.

“Deficits don’t matter,” Dick Cheney once said. And yet . . . the last few days show a stock market that is spooked. Some say it’s the mounting debt and a lack of concern by both parties to address it.

This year, the annual debt will approach and may exceed a trillion dollars.

I remember the heady days when the Tea Party swept in a Republican majority in the House. The biggest sweep by conservatives in a lifetime – nearly a hundred “deficit hawks” elected.

For certain, now Congress would finally go after the debt. The Tea Party railed on about the trillion-dollar annual deficits of President Obama. Surely, the will now existed to contain big government . . .

At first, Republicans only controlled the House, and the powers that be cautioned – “we only control one third of government. We can’t be expected to control the debt.” And so the debt continued to grow.

Then, Republicans took the Senate, and the sage elders counseled – “We only control two thirds of government. We can’t be expected to control the debt. We need the White House.” And so the debt continued to grow.

And then, surprise, surprise – the Republicans won the White House and controlled all three branches, 100 percent of government.
Surely, now the debt would be controlled! Yet, it came to pass, that Republican voices, once raised on high, intoned – “Now, we must govern. Now, we must spend.”

The loudest voices in Congress for breaking the spending caps are now Republican. “The military is being hollowed out,” they cry, even though military spending has more than doubled since 2001.

Meanwhile, the Democrats were long and loud in opposing the recent tax cut because it would add to the deficit. Yet, when questioned on their opposition to busting the budget caps on the military, their response was, “Oh, we’re ok with busting the military caps on spending, as long as we can bust the caps on domestic spending, too.”

Let’s be clear on one thing – tax cuts aren’t the problem. We don’t have a tax deficit. We have a spending surplus. We spend too much, and not enough people are wiling to stop it.

The dirty little secret . . . neither party really cares enough about the debt.

When I attempted to add instructions to the budget to contain entitlement spending, I received only three votes plus mine. The dirty little truth is that neither party cares about the debt.

They will care only when the sky begins to fall. It will take a calamity. It will take a 2008-like crisis that blows through the backstop of the Federal Reserve printing press before Congress recognizes the severity of the debt crisis that faces us.

Let’s all hope that before that crisis comes, saner minds will prevail and understand that great nations cannot last forever on borrowed time, or borrowed money.

Paul is the junior senator from Kentucky.

http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-b...d-debt-budget-deal-will-continue-the-spending
 
Trump described himself as ''The King of Debt'' , although he campaigned on reducing the national debt.
Hannity said the Markets decline is all Obamas' fault.



The U.S. government is set to borrow nearly $1 trillion this year, an 84 percent jump from last year

Trump's Treasury forecasts borrowing more than $1 trillion in 2019 and more than $1.1 trillion in 2020. Before taking office, Trump described himself as the “king of debt,” although he campaigned on reducing the national debt.

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget predicts the U.S. deficit will hit $1 trillion by 2019 and stay there for a while. The latest borrowing figure — $955 billion — released this week was determined from a survey of bond market participants, who tend to be even faster to react to the changing policy landscape and change their forecasts.

upload_2018-2-9_0-1-38.png

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-1-trillion-this-year/?utm_term=.73a6d5561bc1
 
Let’s all hope that before that crisis comes, saner minds will prevail and understand that great nations cannot last forever on borrowed time, or borrowed money.

Yeah.... and people in Hell want ice water.

:(
 
Swamp creatures stir to life as big spending sparks bipartisanship

mitch-mcconnellchuck-schumer-25b9edb342ef6633.jpg




Any time you hear Washington talk about bipartisan agreement, America, grab your wallet and run!

Once again, lawmakers in Washington have finally cut through all the thorny brambles of partisanship and discovered (yet agian! yippie!) something they can all agree upon: spending scads and scads more of other people’s money that we don’t even have!

Ah, yes, bipartisanship. It ranks right up with gonorrhea and cancer and chronic ingrown toe nails for just really fun all around things to have.


Of course, to hear all the jabbering gasbags on the news channels, you would think these people had just discovered a flu vaccine that actually works. Finally, they all say, this is how Washington is supposed to work!

Yes, blowing the most modest little spending caps and burning through torrents of more money that our children and grand children will have to repay — that is certainly how Washington has always worked. Not so sure whether that is how it is “supposed” to work.

God forbid that any of these kleptocrats cut some spending. Or, better yet, take a meat axe to the entire federal government.


Question: Honestly, if the Department of Labor were shuttered tomorrow, dear lowly taxpayer, how long do you think it would be before you actually noticed it?

This is a bit of a double-edged trick question. Of course you would notice immediately because the media would instantly break out in hives and go into a 24-7 meltdown over it so you would hear about it incessantly. It would probably be more proof that President Trump is somehow in cahoots with the Russians.

Other edge of the trick question is that of course if it were not for the blabbering media, you would NEVER know that the Department of Labor had shut down.

Washington politics. I only wish he were more so.

I get that the president is wisely picking his battles and I respect his strategic thinking. He signs the spending bill so he can take the battle deep into Democrat territory and destroy them on illegal immigration. Brilliant.

But in my dreams, I still imagine Mr. Trump calling into his office — on live television, produced by Mark Burnett himself — every single one of his cabinet secretaries and demanding that each explain why his department should not be eliminated. What is so utterly vital about every single department that Mr. Trump should not just get rid of the whole thing right now.

Each secretary would have five minutes to make his case. No notes allowed.

Then Mr. Trump would purse his lips into a duck bill, bob his head, point to the guy and say, “You’re fired!”

Or, if the case has been made, “Deal!”

And the first job of every cabinet secretary who was not summarily fired would be to draft a proposal for how to slash his department by 60 percent.

This is, of course, what happens in board rooms and at kitchen tables all over America whenever things get tight or debt piles up to high. Why should Washington be immune from the same tough choices.

Perhaps this is all just a pipe dream. But with Mr. Trump, it seems, anything is possible.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/9/swamp-creatures-stir-life-big-spending-sparks-bipa/
 
Back
Top