sweedy. good cho
Quote from axeman:
I liked the AMD 64bit chip too. 64 bit is the future.
But I approached this objectively, and all the performance
comparisons I saw clearly put the P4 in the performance lead.
AMD has a sweet chip, but its still slower.
Further, its even slower on the new 64bit version of WinXP.
64bit WinXP is still too new. It made virtually no difference.
I bet the peformance will increase once they get well past the
beta stage, a few production versions later.
peace
axeman
Quote from spyderman:
this review seems to favor the AMD 64, unless I'm eading it wrong....http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,114546,00.asp
why not spice it up even more and add a apple power mac g5 (also 64 bit) to the mix! http://www.apple.com/powermac/

You are lucky that is what your processor is going for. Look at the one I need,Quote from waggie945:
...I think that I am gonna purchase the Northwood P4 at 3.0C for $226.00 at www.newegg.com
...
Quote from axeman:
Actuallty its not "fully loaded", but its effectively fully loaded.
I have it tuned to my backtesting.
I could have added faster harddrives, but it would not
have helped at all since im CPU bound, not IO bound.
Even with average SATA drives (7200 rpm), I benchmarked these drives
in raid 0 configuration to run at:
Average: 43 megs/sec
Top speed: 86 megs/sec
Random seek time: 13.1 ms
Compared to my high performance 15,000 RPM SCSI II drive:
Average: 54 megs/sec
Top speed: 57/megs/sec
Random seek time: 6ms
As you can see, two average drives striped/raid 0, can really
perform well. Since candle data file is sequential, they
can actually outperform my expensive drive in read mode.
Benchmark your harddrives with: http://www.simplisoftware.com
peace
axeman