Quote from scriabinop23:
...
And finally, as our debt levels are unsustainable, a continued deflationary move will have a horribly negative effect on tax revenues when we are continuing to spend at furious rates. Today we can not afford a great depression, since we now have surpassing 70%+ debt to GDP, not to mention social security and medicare entitlements weighing us down. In 1929, debt to GDP was 16.3% (16.9B of debt against 103.6B GDP). Near the trough of the depression, debt ballooned to 27B against 66B of GDP, a debt to GDP ratio of 41%. Consider this: This was in a time without social security or medicare obligations.
During the great depression, the GDP moved from 103.6B to 56.4B (falling 45%). Now, with over 10T of debt against 14.4T of GDP, we are at 70% debt to GDP ratio. If we saw GDP fall 45% (to 8T) and merely maintained our debt level, new debt to GDP would be 125%. If we repeated a similar scale of debt increase (+70% from 10T), our new debts would would be at 17T against an 8T GDP with no meaningful personal savings backdrop. At 5% interest (very optimistic), our debt service cost alone would be $850B/year! All against tax revenues at most around 1.5T (reflective of an 8T GDP). We spend that alone on Medicare and Social Security right now!
...
http://scriabinop23.blogspot.com/2008/11/unsustainable-bubbles-deflation.html
thx for intersting statistics instead of that dribble from portl385 that "Jim Rogers is a clown"
They do have access to best research, but choose not to listen to it based on immediate political or personal interests.