Hydroxycloroquine is Back

Well that's a big risk. What if those cooperate lawyer kids contract mumps or chicken pox as adults? With everyone else being vaccinated the chances are less, but it could happen.

Yeah, I guess its a risk the anti-vaccine folks are willing to take.

Yet, I wasn't willing to take that risk too and made sure my kids were vaccinated prior to allowing them to play with their kids. After awhile, it still made me nervous because those kids are most likely not vaccinated for other things beyond the two diseases I was worry about.

wrbtrader
 
Yeah, I guess its a risk the anti-vaccine folks are willing to take.

Yet, I wasn't willing to take that risk too and made sure my kids were vaccinated prior to allowing them to play with their kids. After awhile, it still made me nervous because those kids are most likely not vaccinated for other things beyond the two diseases I was worry about.

wrbtrader

If you have a kid, get them the chicken-pox vaccine. Because if they don't get chicken pox, they won't be able to transmit the shingles.
 
Yeah, I guess its a risk the anti-vaccine folks are willing to take.

Yet, I wasn't willing to take that risk too and made sure my kids were vaccinated prior to allowing them to play with their kids. After awhile, it still made me nervous because those kids are most likely not vaccinated for other things beyond the two diseases I was worry about.

wrbtrader
In my opinion you are making the right decisions and have reasonable concerns. When nearly everyone is vaccinated, the risk to even the non-vaccinated decreases. Those parents who are not allowing their children to be vaccinated are shirking their social responsibilities.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236284/
 
Is there a doctor in the house. If so give the counter point to the previous posted opinion from a DOCTOR. Otherwise save it.
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: Suntrader yu are against hydro for one reason and one reason only and yu know exactly what that reason is.....:rolleyes:
 
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: Suntrader yu are against hydro for one reason and one reason only and yu know exactly what that reason is.....:rolleyes:
Hydroxychloroquine's efficacy in treating Covid is not a political question; it is a scientific question that's been answered to the satisfaction of most professionals in the medical field. It is pointless to argue it further. There will always be those, even in the medical racket, that are outliers in terms of their thinking. This is good!, but they have to have sound data and reasoning to back their renegade opinions or their colleagues will ignore them. What's not good is being sucked into nonsense that has its origin in social media.

The most amazing thing is that there are still those suckers out there that haven't yet caught on to the unreliability of anything that comes out of trump's mouth. He says he is taking hydroxychloroquine, and there are people in this world who actually believe this!!!
 
proxy-image


June 30, 2011

This material is available primarily for archival purposes. Telephone numbers or other contact information may be out of date; please see current contact information at media contacts.

Viruses are the most abundant parasites on Earth. Well known viruses, such as the flu virus, attack human hosts, while viruses such as the tobacco mosaic virus infect plant hosts.

More common, but less understood, are cases of viruses infecting bacteria known as bacteriophages, or phages. In part, this is due to the difficulty of culturing bacteria and viruses that have been cut off from their usual biological surroundings in a process called in vitro.

Researchers from the California Institute of Technology, funded in part by the National Science Foundation, were the first to use a clever technique to look at virus-bacterium interactions in vivo, that is, within an organism's normal state. The researchers report their results in the July 1st issue of the journal, Science.

https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=120974
Use of bacteria phages has been commonly used as a research tool in biochemistry and molecular biology research labs for many many years.
 
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: Suntrader yu are against hydro for one reason and one reason only and yu know exactly what that reason is.....:rolleyes:
Yes because it hasn't been rigorously SCIENTIFICALLY proven effective.

What has been rigorously proven is Chumpie's incompetence - by his own words and actions Fairy dust, fairy dust it is going disappear. If not gargle with Clorox. And on and on.
 
HCQ is here to stay because it DOES work as an early prevention/treatment WITH Zinc. Don't take it once you are on a ventilator.

If you don't like it for political reasons, just take Quercetin or EGCG instead, they will do the same thing, as good little ionophores they are, helping Zinc to cross the cell barrier.
The zinc thing is another unproven remedy. No doubt it comes from the finding that Zn++ is virustatic/virucidal in vitro at sufficient concentrations, thus the zinc gluconate lozenges sold to treat colds. Apparently they work to some extent if used at first signs of infection. But that's a topical application. The zinc+hydroxychloroquine is likely under controlled test somewhere in the world right now. See the NIH list of on-going covid therapy tests. I think it will have no efficacy internally against covid. But zinc lozenges at first exposure possibly of some value.
 
The zinc thing is another unproven remedy.

Nope, proven by at least 5 doctors who actually using it. Not to mention statistically significant studies. I already posted them, check my older posts and watch them. Other studies are underway too.(also posted earlier)

Your first and last sentences are contradicting each other. :)
 
Back
Top