Quote from Covertibility:
![]()
So if the fund's share price is lower today than 10 years ago, it's doing just fine? Reading this site, one would come to the conclusion that the republican mind should be considered a disability.
Why does Tao post outside the religion and politics part of this site??? I take it he doesn't like me belittling his fellow birthers and whackjobs?? Now the birthers will have to investigate: Did the dinosaurs build Stonehenge?
Quote from jsp326:
So the takeaway here is that
1) Hussman has beaten the S&P since inception. We'll see how the next decade or so goes. He's done better than, what, 95%+ of mutual fund managers?
2) Thread starter is a jealous moron with an agenda who has probably lost 40%+ over the last decade, buying tops and selling bottoms with the herd.
Quote from Covertibility:
I saw HSTRX last year and it looked like a bond fund, and looking at it now, it still looks like a bond fund. Comparing it with one of Pimco's total return funds, it basically has the same return. Punch up morningstar.com, type HSTRX in and you see the basic scheme, a good start but then either at or underperforming the respective benchmark for the past 3-5 year frame.
The whole point of managing money is to make your investors money, not have a fluke year or two and then underperform for considerable periods of time while writing tales of woe.
Here's another good one to follow : HSDVX - his dividend fund with a expense of 2.27%. Will investors even get any form of cash dividend after expenses??? I'm dubbing this the "I drink your milkshake fund."
Beaten his benchmarks by a huge amount??? What exactly do you think are his benchmarks being that he has lost money YTD and over the past 1, 3, and five year time periods and even though ahead 10 years ( a measy 2.24% annualized) still lagged the S&P over that 10 year period.
Hello 007Arb, Are you still around? You are probably retired, by now. Just want to thank you for your book. Thanks again