One person getting through does not a broken screening process make.And I posted a link in another thread showing how poor and pathetic the screening was...
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/1...ackground-checks-despite-questionable-social/
One person getting through does not a broken screening process make.And I posted a link in another thread showing how poor and pathetic the screening was...
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/1...ackground-checks-despite-questionable-social/
One person getting through does not a broken screening process make.
Unless that one person is carrying a biological weapon which could kill thousands, or tens of thousands.One person getting through does not a broken screening process make.
Don't be such a troll.One person getting through does not a broken screening process make.
Yeah it does, when that system admits they won't look at social media for evidence that the person might pose a threat. Why? Because that person or some other person might find it offensive. Broken doesn't even come close to describing what that system is. Criminally negligent comes closer. We now have proof positive that PC is not only stupid beyond comprehension, it's life threatening.One person getting through does not a broken screening process make.
Two, possibly three, of the Paris shooters were fake "Syrian" refugees. The rest were second generation MUSLIM immigrants.Yeah it does, when that system admits they won't look at social media for evidence that the person might pose a threat. Why? Because that person or some other person might find it offensive. Broken doesn't even come close to describing what that system is. Criminally negligent comes closer. We now have proof positive that PC is not only stupid beyond comprehension, it's life threatening.
One person getting through does not a broken screening process make.
How many does it take then? Four thousand?