Human-€induced climate change requires urgent action

[fhl]

The V.A. spent $1.4 billion dollars on green energy projects as they forced veterans to wait for treatment.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/va-spe...us-funds-on-green-energy-projects-cemeteries/

 

[futurecurrents]

The ocean ecosystems are in bad shape and getting worse faster every year. Man is not managing the resource well and seems to be doing he can to screw it up. Acidification of them via atmospheric CO2 is already causing problems with shellfish reproduction in some areas, and then of course there is the warming and altering the currents of ocean waters due to global warming. Jellyfish are like the cockroaches of the sea. They do great when times are tough.

 

[futurecurrents]

it is in part... we are spending billions on agw fake b.s. when we should be caring for our oceans.

and I have already answered fraudcurrents question multiple times.

So just for the record. Is CO2 a greenhouse gas?

 

[fhl]

co2 being a greenhouse gas is a really great theory. The problem is that the US has spewed out tons of green house gases since the 1930's and the temperature has gone down. The charts only show a rise in temp when the global warming fraudsters have performed acrobatics on the data.

Does anyone disagree?

 

[jem]

I will answer your question again... when you answer these.
Has science shown that CO2 is an efficient coolant in the atmosphere.

Hint... check my post above.

2. therefore... how do you know what happens when you add more CO2?
will it function more as a shield or a blanket?
please cite science.

So just for the record. Is CO2 a greenhouse gas?

 

[dbphoenix]

The V.A. spent $1.4 billion dollars on green energy projects as they forced veterans to wait for treatment.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/va-spe...us-funds-on-green-energy-projects-cemeteries/

You mean it's one or the other?

 

[GG in WPB]

GG, is CO2 a greenhouse gas?

I'm not a climate scientist, so I guess I can't answer, and so what if it is, the models are making predictions, then there are observations, what's wrong with challenging the science, like I said before, this is not a religion, in science, there is a THEORY, the theory is tested, then retested, then adjusted, and tested again. All I'm saying is, get very nervous when people say things like "there is no debate", or "the science is settled", especially when they're from the government, and even more so, when there are billion in funding on the line. It's also very telling when anyone that poses questions/challenges is disparaged and called names. That is not science, that is religion.

 

[futurecurrents]

I will answer your question again... when you answer these.
Has science shown that CO2 is an efficient coolant in the atmosphere.

Hint... check my post above.

2. therefore... how do you know what happens when you add more CO2?
will it function more as a shield or a blanket?
please cite science.

So is CO2 a greenhouse gas? Simple basic question.

 

[futurecurrents]

I'm not a climate scientist, so I guess I can't answer, and so what if it is, the models are making predictions, then there are observations, what's wrong with challenging the science, like I said before, this is not a religion, in science, there is a THEORY, the theory is tested, then retested, then adjusted, and tested again. All I'm saying is, get very nervous when people say things like "there is no debate", or "the science is settled", especially when they're from the government, and even more so, when there are billion in funding on the line. It's also very telling when anyone that poses questions/challenges is disparaged and called names. That is not science, that is religion.

So you are telling me that you don't know if CO2 is a greenhouse gas and yet you are arguing about global warming. Don't you see a problem there? Do you think one has to be scientist to know science? Go ahead, look it up, I'll wait. Come back when you know something about the subject you are arguing about.

 

[futurecurrents]

co2 being a greenhouse gas is a really great theory. The problem is that the US has spewed out tons of green house gases since the 1930's and the temperature has gone down. The charts only show a rise in temp when the global warming fraudsters have performed acrobatics on the data.

Does anyone disagree?

You wear an upside down name tag don't you?