What is your basis for such a statement?
Sure, it could be true...thats the damnedest thing about it -- you can never quite be sure that you aren't in a slow-speed car crash. Even if you've been successful in the past, one can never be sure that the tide hasn't turned and what previously worked fine is now slow-boiling you to death. By the time you figure it out conclusively, real damage has been done.
In any case, I think I am alright. If you look at my trading performance over the last 16 months, I have a pretty good profitability ratio and win rate. I have good confidence in the two systems I run (honestly, they aren't that complex), and they've both been back tested over many decades.
I have some discipline issues, but they are improving over time. I have moved from what I would consider blow-up type discipline problems to simply having profitability impacting discipline problems. Meaning, at worst, I believe my discipline issues will only shave a few percent off my returns. I am too careful about risk now to get severely burned.
In any case, the entire point of my approach is really all about figuring out if I am being slowly boiled alive. I have specifically reduced risk so that I could try and establish a long-term track record (and hence, better confidence level) without severe risk of blow up.
While I may be participating in a slow motion car crash, I think the more likely scenario at this point is that I'm just wasting my time. The time investment I've put into this is now measured into the 10's of thousands of hours. I would have made substantially more wealth spending that time working at McDonalds. Even now, I am barely outpacing the S&P 500. If I do not achieve substantial outperformance by year-end 2013 I will probably throw in the towel.
Last year my return was over 50%, but the volatility was enormous. This year I have substantially reduced volatility, but my returns are clearly suffering.
We shall see...in any case, I am curious as to the basis of your statement. Maybe you see something that i don't
