Huge rise in Cancer (CDC data) - mid-April 2021

misterkel said:
Unsourced? That's interesting, cuz right beside where you underlined it says these words:
US Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
More...
You can thank me for making you look harder

misterkel said:
Rate simply means number of X per Y, as in
DEATHS per State by Cause.
Here is the definition:
View attachment 292635
More...
lol, a state isn't a number. Since you're trying hard to "maths", a rate when talking disease on a time scale (as in your statement of "cancer rates" or "rise in cancer" as your title suggests), is number of cases per period of time.
 
Last edited:
misterkel said:
Whoa! Seriously? Your answer to 'Why are cancer rates suddenly going up by nearly 100%? is
Cancer 'spreads'?
What does that even mean? We're talking about a reasoned, scientific, evidence backed hypothesis that best fits the data. If you have a meaningful answer, then share it by all means. Otherwise, why bother? Just to troll?

Plausibility is not the issue. Direct evidence based on reasoning to make a best fit hypothesis is. Many things are plausible, but that is still short of TRUE. More is required.
More...
Back at you, then. What are you implying with your "sacred cow redacted" bit?
 
Cuddles said:
he still thinks the plot is cancer cases and not cancer deaths, go easy on him
More...

Uh - it doesn't matter, cuz cases drives deaths.
Basic stuff. Sorry it seems advanced. It's really not.

But go right ahead and nitpick until you have meaningful input.
I'll wait.
(Jeopardy song playing...)
 
misterkel said:
Uh - it doesn't matter, cuz cases drives deaths.
Basic stuff. Sorry it seems advanced. It's really not.

But go right ahead and nitpick until you have meaningful input.
I'll wait.
(Jeopardy song playing...)
More...
Cuddles said:
evidence that cancer spreads? uwotm8?
More...

I'd post graphs on early detection vs survivability & efficacy of treatments against metastasis to echo ricter but you're struggling w/basic plots as it is already.
 
Cuddles said:
I'd post graphs on early detection vs survivability & efficacy of treatments against metastasis to echo ricter but you're struggling w/basic plots as it is already.
More...

Post away.
While you're at it, how about evidence that the small number of localized hospitals (mostly major urban ones like NY) correlate with a local rise in cancer DEATHS (better?)
Cause it doesn't. The cancer DEATH RATES were evenly spread, but the full hospitals were localized.
Could explain some of the increase, but only a smallish percentage.
 
misterkel said:
Post away.
While you're at it, how about evidence that the small number of localized hospitals (mostly major urban ones like NY) correlate with a local rise in cancer DEATHS (better?)
Cause it doesn't. The cancer DEATH RATES were evenly spread, but the full hospitals were localized.
Could explain some of the increase, but only a smallish percentage.
More...
I'm not going to go look for non-existent evidence of crackpot conspiracies you're reading on twitter, that onus is on you. Better yet, stick to digging ditches, basic arithmetic is above your pay grade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top