Huge majority of you here are losers? Agree?

Quote from Redneck:

I lose nearly every day



RN
=======
Well that just goes to show you;
cutting a loss as a trader /invester, does not make one a loser.Thats what winners do

Tough business, trendy business;
wisdom is profitable to direct:cool:
 
Quote from murray t turtle:

=======
Well that just goes to show you;
cutting a loss as a trader /invester, does not make one a loser.Thats what winners do

Tough business, trendy business;
wisdom is profitable to direct:cool:

You are not a trader, you are an investor. It is easy to make money as an investor. Trading however is at best a zero sum. Mathematics is profitable to use, and hard to argue with. :cool:
 
Exactly. The market doesn't lie but apparently "new" posters at ET do :D

Quote from Redneck:



Traders are condition to believe, without questioning, what they see

You wrote it … we believed it

He's not gullible... You’re a liar

GFY

have a nice day :)

RN
 
Quote from xelite777:

Mathematically, it is IMPOSSIBLE to make WORSE than random trades, this is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.

??? somebody entering the market at random times long or short randomly, will be break-even if you skip the spreads/commissions.. i tried this on about 5 years of EUR/USD. just run it a few times, and the average balance will be break-even.

some brokers actually take the opposite position of their loosing clients because they're constantly worse than a random system :)
 
Quote from xelite777:

Again, you are totally clueless. You will SILL lose in the long run even if your risk-reward is 1000 to 1

And you're not? Risking 1000x. Risk is the numerator.
 
Quote from boskop:

??? somebody entering the market at random times long or short randomly, will be break-even if you skip the spreads/commissions.. i tried this on about 5 years of EUR/USD. just run it a few times, and the average balance will be break-even.

Did I ever say otherwise?

In the absence of spread/commissions, any trader will mathematically break even in the long run, that's precisely what I have been trying to explain.

Quote from boskop:some brokers actually take the opposite position of their loosing clients because they're constantly worse than a random system :)

You are right, but betting against the client via stop hunting techniques (among other things...) is another entirely different subject that has nothing to do with random trading.

If Joe Six Pack is constantly losing money, that does mean that betting against Joe Six Pack will me make money.

Still not convinced?

Look at it this way: If betting on Black at the roulette is a losing proposition in the long run, that does not mean that betting on RED is a winning proposition, and vice versa.
 
Your use of vulgarity not only discredit everything your claim, you just show everyone your pitiful level of intelligence.

You sounded like a follower, blindly following without a brain of your own. Maybe your mother forgot that you ever need one.

Yeah, hold on to your hope, keep believing… :)

Quote from Redneck:

You dumb SOB

Traders are condition to believe, without questioning, what they see

You wrote it … we believed it

He's not gullible... You’re a liar

GFY

have a nice day :)

RN
 
Why would you even bother to join this thread if you think it's so dumb?

Clearly everyone on the thread is a lot smarter than you are.

Name calling & use of vulgarity simply show that you can't converse intelligently & it makes you look really stupid.

Now, go back to your mama. :)

Quote from Rorschach_test:

why do you start such dumb threads,numbnuts?
 
On the screen? Tsk, tsk. Slimy, slimy…Yucky. I know what you talking. lol :D

Quote from luisHK:

FWIW I do screw 18-22 y old birds on the desk while checking the market on one screen and sometimes ET on the other. The craziest one was a fan of Cassie Pictorium btw, but she's unfortunately vanished a couple of weeks ago.
 
Back
Top