Huawei challenging the Constitutionality of US's ban on its products

The main countries outside of the US where I have found equal general ease of doing business is Germany and Canada. The rest of them nickel and dime you to death, moreso than the aforementioned. I do not blame Huawei from wanting to maintain the gravy train. It is very inefficient to go after 100 small markets than 2-3 big ones.


Actually Huawei has been thriving in emerging markets and the third world. A few years back I used to go out with one of the top sales guys there (head of World Sales or Head of Sale in the Americas, he had a bunch of titles and traveling a lot between China, North and South America, he used to be an expat in Africa as well for Huawei in his formative years ). He reckoned Huawei was basically doing great in most of the places in the World but in the US, so US has never been the gravy train for Huawei afaik. It's been going for a multitude of customers in smaller markets for a long time now.
 
Huawei is cheap, we all know CHina can send out the tech cheap so of course they do well in third world because that is where they generate moomentum and cash from sales.
 
Sure. Look at the huge case the EU filed against China specifically about IP theft and forced IP transfers. Filed in June 2018 and expanded in December 2018.

This is language directly from the European Commission:

"The European Union challenged today in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) the systemic practices that force European companies to give up sensitive technology and know-how as a precondition for doing business in China. This legal action builds up on a case launched by the EU in June 2018."

"In its complaint, the EU is targeting rules in China on the import and export of technologies and on Chinese-foreign equity joint ventures. Certain provisions “discriminate against non-Chinese companies and treat them worse than domestic ones,” violating WTO requirements that foreign businesses be put on an equal footing and that IP such as patents be protected, according to the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm."

http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/press/index.cfm?id=1963

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...to-the-wto-over-technology-transfer-practices

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...st-chinese-technology-transfers-idUSKCN1OJ1AP

China rules on trade=/Huawei
 
Google "Huawei stole". It's all there. Huawei stole from startups, entrepreneurs, Nortel, Cisco, Apple,... They ran bonus schemes that encouraged employees to obtain competitors' data. Yes many of them are still allegations, and are still pending law suits and court hearings. So my question to you: despite the countless accusations and cases where previous employees shared the culture of Huawei and its illegal dealings you just say that we should all give them the benefit of doubt and let them freely roam and occupy our national grids all in the hopes that every last allegation will be dismissed? Is that your stance? Cause I like to understand your thinking. Stop injecting Trump or the administration in this, they have nothing whatsoever to do with this. The allegations and lawsuits against Huawei have been lodged long time before Trump singled out Huawei.

So let the DOJ make the case. Don't just use executive power on weak assertions
 
after all, the US has been illegally attacking other countries under false pretexts in blatant violation of international law & UN Charter, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians directly or indirectly while maiming / displacing millions.

That's how WWI & WWII got started, to name a few.
The US started WWI and WWII?
 
But it works can't you admit at least? Add some further export controls especially in several hightech sectors and China will be on its knees and happily implement a law that makes companies that steal IP punishable by law. Plus China voluntarily offers to immediately implement all commitments it made as part of WTO agreements. Insurance electors and Financial sectors open completely to American firms. And just to add some huniliation, Xi will be sucking the dick of every last American ladyboy. It's gonna be so beautiful.

But seriously, this is something America and the world needs and it's worth a prolonged fight.

So let the DOJ make the case. Don't just use executive power on weak assertions
 
Last edited:
Whatever China touches eventually turns to crap because their concerns are short term monetary gian not long term business establishment like Samsung or Apple. When China took over Lenovo/IBM business it went to crap after a while. Their mobile phone line is a rip off of Samsung, why buy the competition trying to copy the leader when you can simply buy the leader. China will always swim in the knock off pool, stealing technology to make it their own.

That I absolutely agree. Long-term quality and after-purchase support of China's products is a major concern. There are only a very few reputable brands of Chinese products that have stood up to the test of time. The majority are only good for dollar stores and at most Walmart. But that's how China makes money, coming out with products that's only good for short amount of time and then forcing you to have to buy it again and again for replacing it so it makes money on the high turnover of repeat sales volume. Lenovo/IBM went into crap after taken over by China because IBM machine is a relatively high-end PC concept that is high-quality build PC that's supposed to last 10+ years; that doesn't fit the Chinese business model where things are only supposed to last 6 months to max. 1 year. There is no money to be made that's why China has to f*** up the Lenovo/IBM machine for them to make money. There is one goal and one goal only in China's business model: Make $$$. Sustainability, ethics, environmental impact, long-term effects, that's all going to have to come later.
 
Back
Top