HowardCohodas Index Options Credit Spread Trading Journal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kinggyppo

I get you. When I quit credit spreads and other spreads and selling premium as a bad investment idea last December. I started out planning to trade a 3 to 5 day trend. However, I hate losing, so I started eliminating every type of whaffle, or zig zag or anything that threatened a loss and ended up now, with a 3 hours to over night trade. My preconceived notion that I was going to do 3 day to 5 day trends, simply disappeared in the weeding out process. I might take another look at it sometime later.
I´m still working on winnowing out the losing type signal intrepretations on the SCALP trade. Even one 100% winning scalp trade per week, would put me in good money.
 
Quote from falconview:

I hate losing, so I started eliminating every type of whaffle, or zig zag or anything that threatened a loss

You might consider another line of work. Tough losses are part of the trading game, like missed putts in golf, or bad beats in poker. If losses get to your head so easily, you're in for lot of pain and suffering.
 
Rodney
I think it depends on the type of trading system you develop. Not that a loss cannot occur. It is entirely possible. As you say, if it occurs you have to deal with it. I do not think it necessary to plan on a trading system that deliberately incurs losses. I´ve known some very rich traders, who trade commodities and futures, but only trade two or three times a year and do very well. They don´t have losses at all.
 
I agree with Rodney King. Seems to me, especially with the options arena, you have two choices:

- lose regularly... if you're still able to come out net positive, then you just might have a real edge.

- lose rarely... you'll never know if you have a real edge, and you're setting yourself up for hidden blow-ups.
 
Quote from falconview:

Rodney
I think it depends on the type of trading system you develop. Not that a loss cannot occur. It is entirely possible. As you say, if it occurs you have to deal with it. I do not think it necessary to plan on a trading system that deliberately incurs losses. I´ve known some very rich traders, who trade commodities and futures, but only trade two or three times a year and do very well. They don´t have losses at all.
If they don't record losses at all, it just means they're holding on during HUGE draw-downs. See my comment above, re: huge potential loss waiting in the wings.
 
I'm not a Mark Fisher expert, but I do like "The Concept of "Next!"" -- the idea being (in my words, not his) to treat your trades like a grocery checkout clerk scanning items as they come down the conveyer belt. Don't worry about whether a particular trade is a winner or loser. Don't "hate" losses. It's just business... Of course, this is an easier mindset to attain when you have a real edge, and are confident you'll come out ahead.
 
Well I guess I´ll bow out of this discussion, as Im just a naive amateur. Like others, I´ve read a lot over decades and formed some opinions, but they would not be appropriate for me to put them here, in the position I am in as a newbie cash trader. I´m just going to have to let the year run out and see how I do.

Beech

Made a good comment about setting yourself up for a huge blowup. It is a question I ask myself regularly. I won´t know until and if it happens. In the meantime, I have to trade based on my own ideas and not what I consider disinformation. Balancing the amount of cash to trade with waiting for a possible blowup, is a serious problem to me though. I worry about it.

I chose options because of the idea of limited risk. So my maximum risk is the option cost, plus commissions round turn. I don´t consider the chatter or noise in the market to be risk, so long as the option is still good and within a sensible time frame, for breaking even. The idea of a draw down then doesn´t apply in the way I´m thinking. The maximum drawdown is already factored in, when I paid money for the options. Riding the waves of the market action and being able to hang on, if your directional guessing is anywhere correct and you have a backup plan if your guess is wrong.
 
I just got an email from a friend who trades in precious metals. He tells me he finally closed out his trade on SILVER with a gain in the several hundeds of percent. He is still worrying about GOLD though.
Now that is what I call a trade! ( grin :)
 
Quote from falconview:

I just got an email from a friend who trades in precious metals. He tells me he finally closed out his trade on SILVER with a gain in the several hundeds of percent. He is still worrying about GOLD though.
Now that is what I call a trade! ( grin :)
One great trade, no matter how profitable, is only of interest if it can be repeated.
 
Quote from jkgraham:

Howard,

I have been looking at your journal and have some questions and comments.

Entry Points:
If entering at 60 days gives you more opportunity for rolling winning spreads, does it at the same time introduce the risk of having more losing spreads?
I trade 60 days out for several reasons.
  • Risk allocation over multiple time frames.
  • More opportunities for roll. A roll implies exiting a spread and entering another on the same side in the same series. Exiting the spread freezes the return. Entering the new spread is no more risky than any other entry provided the same entry rules apply.
  • 30 to 60 trading days left until expiration is generally thought of as optimum time to enter a spread to take advantage of time decay. There are also good arguments that nearer the expiration is optimum. This used to be my primary reason, however after several instances of rapid market movements, I find this less compelling than risk allocation in series with different time to expiration.

Quote from jkgraham:

Do you start with more PUTs spreads than CALLs when the market is trending up and vice-versa when it�s trending down. If so, is it intentional or just a side effect of following the entry point rules.
If the companion spread meets my rules I enter it with the same number of contracts. I used to say that I wanted to be delta neutral as I am not good at predicting market direction. I now understand that delta neutral is in fact a bias on the market going sideways. Here I am with the probabilities as the market moves sideways about 80% of the time.

Quote from jkgraham:

Spread Management:
What happened in the down month? In hind-sight, what could you have done different; aside from the obvious of not entering the losing spread where you did?
My main fault is stretching my rules to accept more PoT to get the companion spread at my price. I no longer "stretch" on PoT and just pass if the credit I desire is not available. This gives me a market bias, but is the same one the options spread prices are giving me. I am now paying more attention to this.

Quote from jkgraham:

Did volatility increase during the down month? If so by how much?
Sometimes. I use VIX as my proxy as well at the IV of the option series.

Quote from jkgraham:

Have you ever considered buying back the Short-Option on a losing spread and letting the Long-Option possibly gain value if the market continues to move in the same direction?
Yes I have, but have not yet done so. I am still analyzing this "opportunity" to understand how best to manage it. This would have saved my bacon a couple of times, but I'm not confident enough to add it to my repertoire.

Quote from jkgraham:

Have you considered rolling losers instead of just closing them?
If there is a spread that fits my rules, I do just that.

Quote from jkgraham:

Deciding when and where to close losers seems a little bit like deciding where to put a trailing stop order on a stock. Close too early and the market could turn around and go back the other way and now you just closed an eventual winner. Close too late and lose more money.
I used some back testing and some analysis to inform my rules. I bail at 20% loss of capital at risk.

T2W_Expectation_Sheet.png


T2W_Expectation.png


Quote from jkgraham:

How much �outside� information do you take into consideration: current events, market trends, support and resistance, etc. or would looking at that allow more emotion to affect your decisions?
It is my contention that all the information I need is in the PoT and credit available for a spread at that level. When I let emotions move me to go outside my tested limits, it has hurt me. I cannot deny what is in my trading journal.

Quote from jkgraham:

The Dashboard:
Did you develop the Dashboard yourself?
The dashboard comes out of a class I taught using airplane instrument panel design considerations and the requirements to manage situations under severe stress. Out of this class came the idea of a book I am still working on titled "All I Know About Options, I Learned in Flight School." The lesson for this point is "being a pilot is hours of boredom punctuated my moments of panic." It's the panic tools that help you too succeed.

The images you see are provided by an application I wrote on my server (PHP with MySQL). It is a prettier version of my Excel version. The Excel version is hot linked to my ToS desktop platform so it has up to the second results. The web application was written to do the same thing for me when I am away from my desk, however ToS has suspended API links to their system for retail customers. I'm working on a solution, but it is not my highest priority.

Quote from jkgraham:

Where I�m at:
I am pushing myself to learn as much as I can about options. I feel like I know what the pieces of the vehicle are, but I don�t know how to put them together or how to drive it once it�s built. The strategy that I plan to master first is credit spreads -> Iron Condors. I will be attending a workshop on May 13-15 which uses Iron Condors as the first strategy that they teach.
Whose class are you attending. You may wish to PM me so I can point out what may be problematic with respect to my methods.

Quote from jkgraham:

In the beginning of my options experience I dabbled with selling Covered Calls and then moved on to selling Naked Puts as a method of buying and selling stocks that I wanted to �trade�. But I now want to do more risk management. I already know that just because a broker tells me that I have more cash or margin available to buy more spreads not to bite off more than I can lose in one month. Once you find a system that works 80-90% of the time I assume that is hard not to. But an investor has got to set rules and stick to them.
Don't forget that winning rates of 80% to 90% generally have a poor risk/reward profile. In practice this means that you will have many months of nice profit, and a setback that may set you back from 2 to 6 months. That still leaves you with an enviable yearly return, however you must properly prepare to survive these events both financially and emotionally.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top