Quote from falconview:
Howard
That does enlighten me a bit. If one side of your Iron Condor loses 20% of the trade capital you close it and take the loss. At the same time, then such index movement would also make the plus money spread in the Iron Condor, probably reach 80% or better of cap maximum, so you roll it.
Now why would you bother to roll a winning trade? A win is a win! Why roll into another month, in which possibly the location of the spread may not be favorable. Why not wait until you can pick your time and location for the next spread?
I can see diversifying across different indexes allows you to trade more trades, I.C.�s and keep your trades smaller capital amounts and avoid confusing the software with mixed Iron condors in one index. The smaller amounts involved for your gross capital would be protected as any loss would be relatively small on any individual trade that way.
Still I have seen the OEX run 15 or 20 points in half a day. You would have to be moving pretty fast to get out at the 20% of trade capital for a spread in such a case. But the 20% does answer one valuable question anyway, on your methodology.
Quote from falconview:
Howard
I didn�t get the situation in which you were worried about a GAP, or
the comment about the spread expiring worthless. Meaning I presume you closed it because it lost 20% of capital of the trade ?
I can guess the increase of the good side of the IC would be more than the 20% loss though. A rollover I understand saves money instead of closing the winning spread? Which may have something to do with the profit balance eliminating some commissions,etc. Never tried a rollover.
Obviously, I was not clear. Let me try again.
If, on the last day of trading, the PoT is greater than 10%, I will close the spread. Sometimes that yields a loss. So far, I have incurred a loss on a spread three times in the 66 spreads that have closed or expired. In these cases, the Iron Condor was still profitable.
In one spread, I was overrun. I placed a market order to close the spread. It was filled at a 30% loss. The Iron Condor showed an overall loss of 20%. This loss was particularly troublesome to me because it was largely the result of an unforced error when I entered the spread. None the less, it is what it is.
I have yet to navigate a circumstance where the market moved in such a way that many, if not all spreads on one side of the ICs would be in trouble simultaneously. I have circuit breakers to close spreads if the underlying gets within one percent of the short strike. Unfortunately, there is not a way to set the circuit breaker based on the loss on capital at risk. Circuit breakers are important because I may not be available to take action when these market moves occur.
I roll winning trades because it lets me earn another credit on the same quarantined funds. Rolling has allowed me to earn up to 50% yield on a spread that would have yielded about 9% without rolling.
If you look at my Dashboard you will note that IC #15 has had 8 spreads as part of it. All, but one spread was due to my rolling rules. One was done because I misread the PoT when choosing the short strike. I got out as soon as I realized it. Luckily at a small profit. When this IC expires this week I will give my usual recap. At the moment, as an Iron Condor the yield is 56% on capital at risk in the 60 days since it was established.
Looking at the history of IC #15 should put my rolling rules into real examples.
Did I miss anything?