Most CHICKS are out of the question? I never would have guessed you were either bisexual or asexual...not sure what else you could be cause eliminating chicks from the equation leaves you with fairly limited choices.....
Im strictly hetero. This comment was within the context
of LONG TERM relationships. Over 99% of chicks do not qualify
for a long term relationship. It takes A LOT OF WORK AND TIME
to find a keeper. During my in between time, Ill take
"non-long term" material as it comes
I just think that its somewhat sad that a guy needs (or chooses) to take advantage of the immaturity of a 16 year old to get off...
Like I said.... most will take the FREEBIE. Kinda hard to call it
taking advantage of when the young chick is throwing herself
at you. (PS. The line was 18 when I was younger, 16 is out of
the question)
But what this whole thing comes down to is pleasure and enjoying sex and as far as I'm concerned, adults (which means I'm not so sure about Spec, but he's entitled to pleasure too) should be able to have as much sex as they want.
So 18 and 27 is OK then?
The fact that many 27 year olds, and mid thirty year old guys, for
that matter, will jump a hot 18 year old that is all over him is
proof that guys simply WANT IT MORE than girls. End of story.
Like you said... you can get sex any time you want it.
This is not true for men.
That is also why I LAUGH INTO THE FACE of any girl that claims
girls want it as much as men.
This also leads to why older men and younger women tend
to match up better. Older men have mellowed out a bit,
and their sex drives more closely match the younger womens...hehe..
There are very very few women in the world that could handle
a 16 year old male. If a 16 year old guy was given unlimited
sex opportunity, he would be humping the hell out of chicks
20+ times a day
If their sex drives didnt mellow out with age, they would surely
all kill themselves out of pure frustration too
peace
axeman