How will you react when Trump/GOP scraps the investigation?

Here4money said:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...s-close-to-being-an-unindicted-co-conspirator

James Comey: Trump is 'close' to being an unindicted co-conspirator

President Trump is "close" to being an unindicted co-conspirator in Robert Mueller's investigation of former Trump's former lawyer,, according to fired FBI Director James Comey.

"Not in the formal sense that he's been named in an indictment," Comey said during a New York City event hosted by MSNBC. "But if he’s not there, he’s certainly close given the language in the filing that the crimes were committed at his direction."

Comey's comment came after Trump last week referred to in a sentencing memo filed by New York federal prosecutors in relation to Michael Cohen, Trump's former fixer. Prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York on Friday outlined in the memo how Cohen told them he had taken steps before the 2016 election to silence women, like porn star Stormy Daniels, from publicizing their alleged extramarital affairs with Trump decades ago "in coordination with and at the direction of individual one." "Individual one" is widely believed to be Trump.


The former FBI chief's remarks also came days after he gave a six-hour interview to lawmakers on the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees Friday in a closed-door session. The transcript of his testimony was released to the public Saturday.

Comey added Sunday that if Trump weren't president, he would be exposed legally.

"That person would be in serious jeopardy of being charged because the government wouldn't make that sponsoring allegation if they weren't seriously contemplating going forward with criminal charges," he said. "Where it stands here I can't say."

The lawyer, whose public profile has risen since his abrupt dismissal from the Trump administration in May 2017 at the hands of the president, also said he would never launch his own a bid for the White House.

"I've thought about it enough to know that I'm never going to run for office," Comey told Wallace.
More...
Except for one thing----No crimes have been committed.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...e9-b5df-5d3874f1ac36_story.html?noredirect=on

Ethics official said Whitaker should recuse from the Mueller probe, but his advisers told him not to, officials say

A senior Justice Department ethics official concluded acting attorney general Matthew G. Whitaker should recuse from overseeing special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe examining President Trump, but advisers to Whitaker recommended the opposite and he has no plans to step aside, people familiar with the matter said.

Earlier Thursday, a different official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said ethics officials had advised Whitaker need not step aside, only to retract that description of events hours later.
 
Here4money said:
Or a SCOTUS is chosen with clear bias that favors Trump, and the strategy is to take it all the way there.

Will you be content with making the Mueller investigation go away this way? Would you rather change the rules to favor Trump than bringing Justice?

I am genuinely curious about the thinking out there.
More...

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/01/02/po...and-jury/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/

Supreme Court teed up to act on mystery Mueller-related grand jury case

Washington (CNN) — The Supreme Court could now decide as early as Wednesday afternoon whether an unnamed foreign-owned company will have to pay daily fines for avoiding a grand jury subpoena related to Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation.
The company submitted a reply under seal to the Supreme Court earlier today, following written arguments it and the Justice Department made last week.
The filing Wednesday tees up a vote by the full Supreme Court.
The company has been trying to avoid a subpoena from a DC-based grand jury, and faced court-imposed fines for every day it did not turn over information.
 
"Hey Mr. Murderer, here's our findings. Anything you would like to correct?"

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...am-should-be-allowed-to-correct-final-mueller

Exclusive: Trump team should be allowed to ‘correct’ final Mueller report, says Giuliani

“As a matter of fairness, they should show it to you — so we can correct it if they’re wrong,” said the former New York City mayor, who is a member of Trump's personal legal team. “They’re not God, after all. They could be wrong.”
 
Here4money said:
"Hey Mr. Murderer, here's our findings. Anything you would like to correct?"

https://thehill.com/homenews/admini...am-should-be-allowed-to-correct-final-mueller

Exclusive: Trump team should be allowed to ‘correct’ final Mueller report, says Giuliani

“As a matter of fairness, they should show it to you — so we can correct it if they’re wrong,” said the former New York City mayor, who is a member of Trump's personal legal team. “They’re not God, after all. They could be wrong.”
More...


Not really unreasonable. The FBI offers that type of thing all the time when government employees are involved in, or often anyway. They offered that to McCabe before referring him for criminal investigation.

If you have a criminal charge against him and an indictment then it is a criminal matter so that process does not apply. Let me know when that happens.
 
TreeFrogTrader said:
Not really unreasonable. The FBI offers that type of thing all the time when government employees are involved in, or often anyway. They offered that to McCabe before referring him for criminal investigation.

If you have a criminal charge against him and an indictment then it is a criminal matter so that process does not apply. Let me know when that happens.
More...

Anyone can offer to change or "correct" any record. However, the drafter doesn't have to agree to the proposed changes or so-called "corrections."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top