How will you react when Trump/GOP scraps the investigation?

Slartibartfast said:
Seriously, garbage in and out is all you do. Are you trying to say that yes they did but it was not much?

Do you understand that the purpose of the investigation is TO ESTABLISH PROOF OF THEIR INTERFERENCE (or not)?
More...

Well first you start with evidence that rightly raises suspicion. If the evidence justifies suspicion, only then you open expensive investigation to find proof that can put someone behind bars.

The House investigators keep asking, what evidence do you have that justifies opening this expensive investigation?

I'm not saying the Russians are biased, but that's the most evidence anyone has at this point, if they even have evidence. But there is no evidence that Russia even had a bias, with as many indications for Trump as against Trump.

Nor has there been evidence of bias connected to Russian officials representing the Russian government.

Do you think bias is good enough reason to open an expensive investigation?
 
Good1 said:
Well first you start with evidence that rightly raises suspicion. If the evidence justifies suspicion, only then you open expensive investigation to find proof that can put someone behind bars.

The House investigators keep asking, what evidence do you have that justifies opening this expensive investigation?

I'm not saying the Russians are biased, but that's the most evidence anyone has at this point, if they even have evidence. But there is no evidence that Russia even had a bias, with as many indications for Trump as against Trump.

Nor has there been evidence of bias connected to Russian officials representing the Russian government.

Do you think bias is good enough reason to open an expensive investigation?
More...

Are you a child? "you are not saying the Russians are biased"?

How the fuck dare you speak to adults like this? You half-wit blatherer.

Get back to your own planet.
 
The problem is that this has never truly been about “the Russians”.

We already know what “the Russians” did - could have written that report last year.
 
Time is Mueller’s enemy. The efficacy of his works grows weaker by the day. Nothing but self-serving orbital parasites and bottom feeders have been subpoenaed or indicted to date. If there was a prosecutable action for Trump we would have heard about it by now.

If it weren’t for billable hours Mueller would welcome a mercy killing. But the Republicans won’t do it for good reason.
 
bone said:
The problem is that this has never truly been about “the Russians”.

We already know what “the Russians” did - could have written that report last year.
More...

Yeah, however the means and methods & motives (and how/if these changed) have to be understood in painful detail. Putin & Co. Oligarchy are in a state of cold war again with the West, gloves off. This report is bigger than just the US, they are interfering all over the world in developed nations. This has to be tackled.
 
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/11/6280...boss-for-justice-department-criminal-division

Guy never prosecuted a case and gets confirmed....you've gotta be shitting me. So next in line after Rosenstein gets ousted.


upload_2018-7-12_0-16-9.png
 
Slartibartfast said:
Yeah, however the means and methods & motives (and how/if these changed) have to be understood in painful detail. Putin & Co. Oligarchy are in a state of cold war again with the West, gloves off. This report is bigger than just the US, they are interfering all over the world in developed nations. This has to be tackled.
More...
When have they not been doing that? And why is that so important now? Do you think we would be having this investigation if Hillary, or anyone besides Trump, had won?
 
Arnie said:
When have they not been doing that? And why is that so important now? Do you think we would be having this investigation if Hillary, or anyone besides Trump, had won?
More...

From 1991 to 2000 they were busy dealing with their own mess, Putin was appointed in 1999, it took him a while to get the state machine back in order.

Many heads of state are narcissistic however Putin is many believe the richest man in the world. He is not just a narcissist, many leaders are somewhat/strongly (and here are different types), he is a high-functioning megalomaniac narcissist. He has a vision of himself as a historical great figure. Trump is also but a pale shadow with fragile narcissist being quite dominant.

Putin and Hillary have history from the US' interference in Putin's 2012 (rigged) election, he was out for revenge after that as it called his validity into question.

Why would she not have had some level of investigation into Russian interference? How was it going to harm her?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top