I'm sorry but is that roman numerals nonsense too?
You made a conclusion that it's unlikely based on a set of assumptions. In the end it does not matter if it's unlikely or not, it's in no way is in relation to the topic.
I'm sorry but is that roman numerals nonsense too?
You made a conclusion that it's unlikely based on a set of assumptions. In the end it does not matter if it's unlikely or not, it's in no way is in relation to the topic.
Whatever you got to tell yourself.ok next time. This time, I am still correct.![]()
If you remember I asked OP the question(s).You made a conclusion that it's unlikely based on a set of assumptions. In the end it does not matter if it's unlikely or not, it's in no way is in relation to the topic.
If you remember I asked OP the question(s).
As for "...unlikely based on a set of assumptions". IMO that is what you did.
Pure numbers and the fact historically low priced stocks start on Nasdaq says to me at least which viewpoint is more of an assumption.
NYSE 2400 stocks
Nasdaq 3300 stocks
Maybe you would want to use a broker with zero commissions that doesn't accept payment for order flow?
Follow along, I never said Op wasn't trading the same low priced NYSE names.I ask again, how do you know he is not trading the same low priced NYSE names all day?
Ah, you don't, you're just assuming, got it.
Maybe you would want to use a broker with zero commissions that doesn't accept payment for order flow?
https://www.merrilledge.com/investing/best-execution-trading
View attachment 265650
https://www.fidelity.com/trading/execution-quality/overview
View attachment 265651
But I doubt if they can give you your current 200:1 leverage.
Merill doesn't take PFOF, but they route to BofA Securities not to lit exchanges, so they are their own market maker, they pay themselves as they are part of BofA.
Fidelity routes most trades to market markers such as Citadel and Virtu even if they don't take payment for that.