Take any stock. What's the cost to buy 100 shares? What's the premium on the ATM put? Worst situation: company goes bankrupt. You'll lose more money with the long stock than short put. Only exception would be if the company paid a very high dividend and the premium ended up being less than the dividend. Extremely unlikely.
So you speak for all retail traders? Wrong. I very frequently sell ATM and slightly ITM puts to hedge calls / adjust delta / add new exposure.
As I pointed out above, even in the worst-case situation, short put exposes the investor to less absolute risk due to the premium received. Although it's true that the premium comes at the price of reduced maximum reward potential, you won't be able to convince your broker to extend extra leverage because you think some asset has more reward potential. Send me a link to the concept that you are describing by: "The other is related to analyzing forward risk based on mtm accounting."
Ok, so we are in agreement that it's still less risky than long stock. I never claimed that put selling is risk-free.
Yeah but that still does not address the risks accurately to newbies. to say the naked put is technically less risk than owning stock outright is winning on a technicality. However getting wiped out is getting wiped.out regardless of your loss.was reduced by $2.00/ share.
