how to manage false breakouts on NQ ES

Quote from jack hershey:



I am able to read your postings of charts.

I see you are a scalper and that the graph has a time line on the bottom expressed in minutes. The right side is showing price.

This is a gee whiz graph. I would suggest a five min bar and 10 points for price labelling at the interval between labels.

The entry to make money was in the bottom corner of your graph and the exit was about an hour later.

This is not scalping. It is just a mechanical trend following slow grind to make the vertical range of your graph hour by hour.

It is my opinion that only trends should be traded until you have made some money. I recommend stages of money making.

As a beginner a person could run that hour with 20 contracts and get a beginning cash flow coming in. Also I do not think using 20 contracts is something that is done during the first quarter when one is starting up. Use minimum money until you can capture trends easily with trend lines and simple indicators.

I think that scalping has many limitations compared to making money. You see that you trade for 5 to 10 min and pull down a net profit. If you miss the exit, you just make more money instead if you catch the next one. If you entered and missed 6 to 12 exits and finally got out on the trend change exteme, you might do quite well.

Jack advocates entering on the breakout, (that's what i read in his stochastic thread). So as a breakout -trader you need to ride trends in the Es, otherwise you get whipsawed bankrupt. Such a method won't work in 1 min timeframe. BUt hat doesn't mean a scalper can't have positive edge in the 1 min timeframe and beat the trendrider's bottom line at the end of the day.
 
Breakout,

Actually, I have been a member for a little less than a month or so. I have been reading many threads and trying to get up to speed as to what has been discussed to this point.

I was going to post a comment about trading trends while learning to scalp. Jack beat me to it and I commented on my agreement.

What is so interesting about that?

Should I have made my first post elsewhere and then come back to here...lol?
 
Quote from dbphoenix:


Your results will tell you what's working at the time.

From October thru January, trading breakouts was like driving up to an ATM. Since then, retracements have been the way to go. At some point, breakouts will be the strategy, and you'll be sitting there waiting for your retracement while price leaves you far behind.

:D

quick [dumb] question - i'm not sure i know what you guys mean by 'retracement' - do you mean pullback to the breakout level? and when you say 'trading retracements' does that mean buying the pullback to the breakout level??

thanks in advance (and great thread, btw),
-b
 
Quote from Rhiger:

Breakout,

Actually, I have been a member for a little less than a month or so. I have been reading many threads and trying to get up to speed as to what has been discussed to this point.

I was going to post a comment about trading trends while learning to scalp. Jack beat me to it and I commented on my agreement.

What is so interesting about that?

Should I have made my first post elsewhere and then come back to here...lol?

Oh, okay...cool. I'd still be interested in hearing what you have
to say about trading trends while learning to scalp. And welcome
to the boards!
 
quote from jack hersey :

I think that scalping has many limitations compared to making money.
On the contrary. I think that when a trader limits themselves to trading with the major trend they suffer many drawdowns within the overall trend and limit money making opportunities.

In fact the scalper that has a fixed set of entries/exit signals and good money management won't be exposed to as many risks, especially overnight drawdowns.

Since the subject of this thread is index futures trading I will address my comments to index futures when I say that indices do not lend themselves well to trend trading because trendlines are frequently broken and then the direction is continues. There are many fake-outs and directional reversals that frustrate even the most disciplined trader.
 
Quote from spreadem:

Since the subject of this thread is index futures trading I will address my comments to index futures when I say that indices do not lend themselves well to trend trading because trendlines are frequently broken and then the direction is continues. There are many fake-outs and directional reversals that frustrate even the most disciplined trader.

This matters only if one defines trend trading in terms of a trendline, and only then if one exits simply because the TL has been broken.

I thought I knew what pawpaw was going for in his initial post, but I may have been wrong. For some reason, these discussions always wind up being about mechanical scalping, and that's a shame.
 
Quote from jack hershey:

See attached graph.


Okay...I see what you're saying, now. And that's cool. But, I
wouldn't be able to do that. That doesn't mean that you're
wrong and I'm right, okay. We're both right...it's just that I
would rather get in and out 5 times on the way up rather than
try to hold that 1 trade for a hour.

Thanks for posting the chart...a chart speaks a thousand words.
 
Quote from spreadem:

On the contrary. I think that when a trader limits themselves to trading with the major trend they suffer many drawdowns within the overall trend and limit money making opportunities.

In fact the scalper that has a fixed set of entries/exit signals and good money management won't be exposed to as many risks, especially overnight drawdowns.

Since the subject of this thread is index futures trading I will address my comments to index futures when I say that indices do not lend themselves well to trend trading because trendlines are frequently broken and then the direction is continues. There are many fake-outs and directional reversals that frustrate even the most disciplined trader.

Nice set of comments. It is good to see where a person is in their methodology.

your explicite current challenges appear to be:

1. Drawdowns.

2. incompatibility of trend lines and futures indexes

3. "fake outs"

4. directional reversals

Some implicite ones:

a. money management exposed to risks.

Add the Breakout viewpoints:

See elsewhere.

This doesn't look good for you.

It does have to be said, however, that there is someone on the other side of where you are.

Again thanks for your comments. I can see that being in your place isn't too hot.
 
Back
Top