I support wrbtrader’s posts. There is an example here on elite trader of a university student learning to trade based on what his professor recommended.
Go to the general "forums" page near the upper left hand corner of this page. Once you are in "forums", then do a search (on the upper right hand side) though the forums for the member "Lajax" and look at his sequential threads on NQ-price action (with a thread for each of the below steps). [edit -- links added below.]
You will see a
process of learning from observing <--> back testing <--> forward testing <--> sim trading <--> live trading. And going back and forth as necessary
until your stats carry across. You don't have to follow DB Phoenix (as Lajax did) to use this process. Whoever you follow, working a process like this... because you have to learn your own way to trade regardless, IMO the process is as much or more important than who you follow. Once you have the process, if you run into a problem you just go back and work it through the process; or if you want to add something new to your trading, the process is one way to do it.
Look at how much time Lajax spent before even considering sim or live trading. And it appears the wrbtrader is recommending even more of a base of understanding before trading.
I will say that it is easy to overtrade in an effort to reach 100 trades in each step of the process as Lajax did – a natural tendency. The truth is in the saying: “the faster you go the longer it takes”.
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/price-action-nq.289300/
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/price-action-nq-ii.290256/
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/price-action-nq-iii.290851/
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/simulated-combine-nq-i.291787/
http://www.elitetrader.com/et/index.php?threads/simulated-combine-nq-ii.292323/