How to deal with Rioters - Terrorism charges

[Tony Stark]

So no examples to support your assertion. Got it.

As I stated,your post history.What side of kneeling at sports events are the white supremacist on?What side are you on?

You start a thread that blacks should be locked up a long time for rioting and post in it over and over again for months but your posts or threads for the cause of thier rioting(blacks being killed and brutalized by cops) is nearly non existent.

 

[gwb-trading]

As I stated,your post history.What side of kneeling at sports events are the white supremacist on?What side are you on?

You start a thread that blacks should be locked up a long time for rioting and post in over and over again in it for months but your posts or threads for the cause of thier rioting/blacks being killed and brutalized by cops is nearly non existent.

Good luck with your fallacies

 

[gwb-trading]

The Revolutionary War started with a riot against the most powerful army in the world....

An army which had trips in only one city in the colonies, Boston.

There is a difference between a violent riot and armed revolution.

 

[Tony Stark]

Good luck with your fallacies

You mispelled facts.

 

[Tony Stark]

.

There is a difference between a violent riot and armed revolution.

The most well known riot in history(Boston Tea Party)happened before the revolution.

 

[gwb-trading]

The most well known riot in history(Boston Tea Party)happened before the revolution.

You really need to understand why the British Troops were marching to Lexington and Concord.

While at the same time note that British troops were not involved in the Boston Tea Party and did nothing to stop it in 1773.

 

[newwurldmn]

An army which had trips in only one city in the colonies, Boston.

There is a difference between a violent riot and armed revolution.

one mans revolution is another’s riot.

 

[El OchoCinco]

An army which had trips in only one city in the colonies, Boston.

There is a difference between a violent riot and armed revolution.

Was still a riot against a more heavily armed squad and larger number of troops. Britain sent thousands upon thousands of troops to put down the growing riots and lost an entire continent pretty much.

We dont have armed rioters taking over the country or asking for independence. When you shit on a group of people for 450 years, we should not be surprised that they get violent despite it not being helpful.

The right is trying to win back an election claiming the U.S. is being invaded by immigrants and being overrun by armed mobs everywhere...

 

[Tony Stark]

You really need to understand why the British Troops were marching to Lexington and Concord.

While at the same time note that British troops were not involved in the Boston Tea Party and did nothing to stop it in 1773.

You really need to understand what the hell you are posting because you clearly don't.

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

The right is trying to win back an election claiming the U.S. is being invaded by immigrants and being overrun by armed mobs everywhere...

Works both ways doesn't it.

One can argue that the left is trying to consolidate its power by allowing undocumented democrats to flood the country and by allowing mobs of lefties to terrorize cities.

An argument that also comes with considerable evidence to support it.

The other point- and this contrary to your assertion- lots of people- even many democrats are opposed to the mobs coming across the border and taking over the streets because they are opposed to mobs at the border and mobs taking over the streets. Not because they are attempting to reverse an election.

Some of you do not get that point. The midterm elections will help to focus your minds a bit.