I think the fact that it is exempt from regulation and most investment company and 33 Act requirements gives it greater flexibility in charging management/performance fees and such.
Quote from marketsurfer:
a hedge fund is not a broker dealer itself, yet charges fees. how is this rectified with having to be a broker-dealer to receive a fee for raising capital for same?
thanks,
surfer
Quote from Maverick74:
Surf, it's the best to my knowledge that in order to raise money for a fund it has to be through an Introducing Broker (IB). These people are registered as IB's through the NASD. This is a very very dangerous area as has been pointed out on this thread. If you lose your clients money, a sharp lawyer will come after you for any i's you didn't dot and t's you didn't cross. That's their job.
I also find it funny that people on ET think that their Aunt Betsy can raise funds for them. I believe however the loophole in the law does not pertain to family members or close relatives. So if your father talks your uncle into putting money into your fund, you are safe. I think this also applies with your spouse and in-laws.
Quote from Maverick74:
Surf, it's the best to my knowledge that in order to raise money for a fund it has to be through an Introducing Broker (IB). These people are registered as IB's through the NASD. This is a very very dangerous area as has been pointed out on this thread. If you lose your clients money, a sharp lawyer will come after you for any i's you didn't dot and t's you didn't cross. That's their job.
I also find it funny that people on ET think that their Aunt Betsy can raise funds for them. I believe however the loophole in the law does not pertain to family members or close relatives. So if your father talks your uncle into putting money into your fund, you are safe. I think this also applies with your spouse and in-laws.
Quote from 2cents:
stupid.... nobody with anywhere near a decent perf needs give away perf fee so badly to collect funds...
fwiw, i charge 0-20 monthly for 1st tier clients (generally long term acquaintances, business or otherwise), and 1/2pip mark-up on all transactions. people who have money with me, and only them, can refer other people who trust them, thats a 'trusted person chain', saves me a lot of headaches... i charge the referred persons 0-25 monthly, i keep 20, referrer gets 5, i.e. 20% of the perf fee...
Quote from mahras2:
Need some help:
Say this person acts as a referral and sends clients my way? How should I compensate him/her? What is the typical market rate? This person is asking for 20% of the performance fee I collect which looks too high as s/he isn't taking the risks, I am.
Anyone have any experiences with this? Any help appreciated.
profitable money managers have choices too, notably the ability to wait... feel free to keep yr money palQuote from NTB:
20% of both Management and performance fee for the life of the client is industry standard. I've heard as high as 30% for early-stage capital and as low as 15% for larger funds with established track records. This is a well worn path, there is a definate industry standard. Personally, I think 100% of the management and incentive fee for the first $10 Million introduced into your Fund is appropriate and creative. Fund managers need to understand that they are not God's gift to Wall St. and investors have many choices. The first $10 Mil. is very hard to raise. Think about it if you are really hungry to run a hedge fund.
)) ... incredible the kind of b/s we have to sit thru from no-value-adding asset gatherers sometimes.... agree with the first few lines tho'...