Quote from jack hershey:
For the humor of it lets pose a problem related to the markets and their periodicity.
This would involve the nonstationarity of the markets. We call that x1y1 since that is the use of x1y1 ordinarily.
x3 y3 is a forward looking coordinate of a "container". To most people this is gibberish. So be it, who cares about them. To some people, they recognize it is a point of optimum profit for doing crossover trading of big money pools.
Lets look at the periodicity of the instrument that is being traded with a neutral bias. This is the track of x2, y2.
Does the instrument perform under EMH? Hell no.
Is a continuing marginal analysis required to optimize cross over trading of all the instruments in an outstanding high performance Universe? Absolutely.
This is the classic two line problem that has been approached by brain power since before the DOW theory even hit the street.
By scribing the path of x3, y3 in advance of the Present, when price actually hits this path, it may be considered a turning point primarily based on periodicity.
Does any one here think Trader666 even has a damp wet spot somewhere regarding any of this? Trader666 is a dry well if there ever was one.
ET is not exactly a wellspring of talent or ideas.
Obviously, a person has to put the variables in any problem solution.
If some baby turkey leaves them out, then he needs more scratch before we chop his head off.
Is everyone a dumb fuck around here?