No this has nothing to do with the prediction of future moves. I am not talking about whether the stock will reach a certain price or not. I am saying when the price of the stock WAS ONLY $20 and you had to pay $40 to buy it at double the price AT THE SAME TIME because you got assigned from shorting the put when you could've really bought it at $20 because that price was available to you. And when the stock ALREADY reached $100 at the same time you are only going to get $50 from again being assigned from shorting the call. Again that $100 is already reached, not some price that you still have to predict whether the stock will reach or not. The stock has already reached that price, $100! But because of the assignment of the call, you could only get $50 when you could've sold it for $100 if you've held stock itself or even a call. Opportunity cost is what I am talking about and I am just using arbitrary prices.
And quite honestly if you have call strike being so far apart from the put strike, you wouldn't be earning that much premiums. But if you want to earn some decent premiums then you would need to have the call and put strikes to be closer to each other and that just cuts off the potential profit even more especially should the price goes up for a large amount with the possibility of a potentially huge downfall that is unprotected and unhedged.
Anyway you said:
So I am giving you feedback and comment and discussion.
winstonwee (sorry for quoting your quote of him JSOP), let me try and come at this with a slightly different angle. You keep saying your system lets you buy low and sell high, and asking if people have a better solution for this. I don't think there is a better solution, because like I, JSOP and others are trying to tell you, your option wheel strategy is just a timing thing, and your timing could be good or bad. So, take as an alternative to your strategy, waiting for a pullback, as is in your strategy, but waiting for a BIGGER pullback, the price you would by at if you sold the put, and it got exercised, for example. Then buying when it hits THAT price. Or heck, even waiting until it hits a LOWER price. Then, when you buy, don't sell a call, wait for the stock to go EVEN HIGHER before you sell. Thus buy EVEN LOWER and sell EVEN HIGHER, making more money!!! Thus a much better strategy!!!
Of course, we both know that just the fact that you might have (potentially, if the right buy/sell conditions arose) bought lower, and sold higher, in that alternative strategy is far from conclusive as to whether it is better than your strategy - it just depends on the stock price action. Who knows. What I think all of us are trying to tell you is that your strategy is absolutely, positively nothing special. There is absolutely no reason your strategy should generate better positive risk-adjusted returns in the future versus any number of alternative strategies, like the one I made up above. If the market price action works one way, its great for your strategy. If it goes another way its horrible for your strategy. There is no "alpha" in your strategy at all, as I think so many around here would say.
Not that you can't make money off it, just that there is no particular reason to think you'd make more money with it over any other strategy.
But, if its working for you, keep doing it and keep sharing your results!!!!