Incoming:
I will attempt to break down what you say. Please correct me as needed.
By vertical, you refer to the mindset of looking at price moving as going up and down, right?
YES
By horizontal, you refer to the idea of looking at price as moving from left to right in time
I look at TRENDING price as moving from RIGHT to left. In terms of boundaries price, when moving with the TREND, price is going from the RTL of the boundary (channel, generically speaking) TO the LTL.
The second half of what could be going on is more complicated. This is because price is moving from the LTL to the RTL and to say it is moving from left to right is harder to understand when a person's mind is as yet undifferentiated.
crayola 101 is used to make the point. Lets say you are doing BPA and you want to be complete. You say:"By horizontal, you refer to the idea of looking at price as moving from left to right in time" The missing "eh?" is easy to add mentally for me. But what I have difficulty with is why you know about up and down and you do not differentiate with equal differentiation on the horizontal. My trouble over here. Your BPA level over there.
I do workout sheets for programmers. Why? They, ordinarily, do not take good notes. It troubled me until I improved my Tia Chi.
Someone said to me about a year after they handled a sentence I offered. Then there was a little BPR on that person's part. He was iteratively refining to get back to the original sentence.
Left and right is the identity with up and down. They are both of very poor quality. Very means more than as in an inequality.
Going with the TREND and going AGAINST the trend turn out to be beautiful yet identifiable separate characteristics of market operations. Where does the TREND come from? Within or without? For BPA is comes from within and for BPR it comes from without.
The progress report says good. From now on one change. We will use critical thinking for BPA and BPR. We means I shall and you should.
Frankly, if that's what you mean, then I agree. It felt like an epiphany finally grasping what you write about how you can plan out several trades in advance. Is that thinking horizontally?
Luckily, there is no other way to do anything in trading. Most people have to lay on their left side so to speak. It is possible to imagine a conrtarian laying on his right side.
The delviness of this is not difficult. A person has to get to a neutral bias some how. Using a sldege hammer just makes a person shorter though. Yoga is better.
If you begin to do BPA from a neutral orientation then we will get to the orthogonalities sooner and farter away from opposites faster.
I am unfamiliar with planning trades. What I deal with is information the market delivers to me that is framed in the logic of alternatives being eliminated in a multivariant system where the differentiated mind allows a person to unconsciously (like a coded up computer would) "know that he knows".
Thinking from the future to the present?
Keep that coin with you at all times. Super and yes.
Trading is way back thee in the Present. As you look through the pane between you and pack there in the present, you see the place where there is a focal plane that ALWAYS contains the ONLY alternative that in a moment the Present will change to, if a change will be occurring; if not, not. You are nearer or farther from the Present at your choice as you sit in the Future and look back to the Present.
You have a definite time advantage all of the time.
Hopefully, I'm making headway and getting into the groove of how you perceive the market. Perception is everything!
Perception is 100% as you say. Its two parts are sensory 10% and inference 90%. Read "The Itch" in the NEW Yorker. About reading, get to a point you know what page everything is on. In the article, you can see how the diagram below works on real people.
It seems that concept relates to the pace of the market. You talk about the human nature of it operating faster and gradually slowing till lunch, then quickening again right after lunch, then decelerating till a big final burst in the afternoon due to automated risk management.
It's clear that if a person or ATS can get into the "rhythm" of the market, then the TIME to reverse can be "felt" or planned irregardless of the price level. In fact, you talk about trading with the price bars completely OFF the screen just by watching pace and volume indicators.
It's absolutely genius. Jack, THAT is the true essence of your trading skill. I think you're the first to even come close to describing the "knack" for trading that people develop with experience.
Many others can't seem to express why they can trade almost automatically at the right moment.
It will be a challenge for YOU and for ME both to reach the goal. That is, of course, for me to understand and automate your perception.
My response to the above will take a while
It seems however, that we need to first stick to getting the channel states sorted out, right? Is that the first step?
I will trail along and be responsive along with all the others. We do need three levels of annotation; the syllabus shows that. The beginning part was two months long.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We will see that "building" can go in either of two directions: analysis or synthesis. People communicate from these points of view too.
Knowledge and technique are paired for making money. What and why are in the locus of knowledge and the how and when relate to technique. I presume that the B. P. A. will nail the knowledge in a series of steps and the B. P. R. will nail the technique (skill levels) in a series of steps.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. Precisely! I won't bore with all the steps.