Quote from jem:
There it is in a nutshell.
All stu has to do is show us proof of life evolving from non life and he would prove I am incorrect. (he told us there is plenty of proof)
But he would rather lie.
There it is, in a nutshell, indeed. Lying again about something I have not said. As a consummate liar you can't help yourself.
Quote from jem:
Note. I do not have to alter others statements... because every scholar on the subject knows we have no known pathway from non life to life. There is no exception to that statement.
No, you don't have to alter statements. But you do.
Here is a known pathway ....
- "Dr Clarke said: "There are a lot of fundamental questions about the origins of life and many people think they are questions about biology. But for life to have evolved, you have to have a moment when non-living things become living -- everything up to that point is chemistry.
"We are trying to understand the chemical origins of life. One of the interesting questions is where carbohydrates come from because they are the building blocks of DNA and RNA. What we have achieved is the first step on that pathway to show how simple sugars -- threose and erythrose -- originated." Science Daily
A known pathway (one of many) and a scientific step achieved along it.
Now you can start altering some more wording, lie about something in it that has not been said, change meaning, be willfully ignorant about what IS being said, just to mindlessly try and protect your personal vain beliefs like a madman.
Quote from jem:
The first person who shows a pathway for non life to life in a peer reviewed manner will be exalted to the level of scientists like Pasteur and Einstein.
No they won't. Such things are not on the scale of discovery as Pasteur and Einstein. Shows how much you understand.
It's a given in all common sense terms, and scientific explanation leaves no rational doubt, that non life to life is all about chemical reaction. In that regard there is nothing that special to discover. It is not about an imaginary magical wizard.
Quote from jem:
Stu... what scientists is known for proving or even showing a full pathway of life evolving from non life.
Go on you lying troll. Tell us.
Scientists don't convince creationists how evolution is a fact.
Scientists don't prove to flat earthers how the Earth is not flat.
Scientists don't explain to consummate liars such as yourself of pathways to do with how life can come about from non life.
Nothing does those things.
So come on Jem. Tell "us" how YOU are not a troll.
