Quote from Joseph Pipp:
I have to disagree with Trend Fader's point on track records. If a "guru" is selling his sytem based on track record, then yes he should pony up. But, track record means nothing to being able to teach. I have successfully made a great living for 10 years trading, but I couldn't teach a person to trade if my lfe depended on it. I am simply not able to verbalize what I do nor am I patient enough with a newbie. I have had people who helped me considerably along the way who couldn't put it together with their own trading, but understood perfectly what should be done and gave great feedback about what I was doing.
I hate the vendors trolling on this site more than the next guy does, but to blanket say they should show their track records or they are no good is absurd. If they are selling a system that requires no understanding but simply execution, then a track record is vital.
In general, I am opposed to selling training at all. I learned from experienced people who passed on their knowledge and always attempt to do the same (although as I earlier admitted, teaching is not my strong point.)
Trading is an art. It is not a specific science with absolute rules. Teaching an art is next to impossible and anyone who promises to teach you an art without knowing what your tlent for that art is beforehand is nuts. You can no sooner teach some people trading than Picasso who teach me to paint. I maxed out at crayons as my medium.
I disagree... what makes a good math professor. Someone that knows math and someone that knows how to explain it.
To be a mentor.. not only do u have to be a good trader u also have to know how to help other traders achieve.
Paramount to being a good explainer or hand holder.. u have to know your shit and back it up.
Why anyone would listen to someone that does not provide solid credentials.. is beyond me.