How Republicans are weak on national security

[TGregg]

Actions have consequences. One of the negative consequences of the Department of Homeland Security’s push for shamnesty is its shrinking credibility. From the dog-and-pony show raids before shamnesty hit the Senate floor to the smearing of opponents during the legislative debate to the inaction of “emergency” border security appropriations after the bill’s defeat, DHS and its chief Michael Chertoff have abandoned principled enforcement of immigration laws for cynical, open-borders politicking.

<A href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/02/the-diminished-credibility-of-the-dept-of-homeland-insecurity/">More</a>.

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Quote from TGregg:

<A href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/07/02/the-diminished-credibility-of-the-dept-of-homeland-insecurity/">More</a>.

yes, exactly. I was reading an account of his appearance on Fox News yesterday. He sounded like a petulant child. Congress voted down his amnesty scheme so now he won't enforce the border. This guy desperately needs to be fired before his incompetency leads to another tragedy.

The democrats have wasted all this effort trying to nail bush on a variety of made-up "scandals" like the US Attorney firings and Cheney's papers. They have a real one right in front of their noses, one the american voters care desperately about, and they ignore it because they are in bed with the administration on amnesty and open borders.