Well someone better tell this joker he argued he was right for nothing, or are you really just trolling for fun ?
How profitable are the traders and coaches at tst ?
- Thread starter volente_00
- Start date
Well someone better tell this joker he argued he was right for nothing, or are you really just trolling for fun ?
I said they got rid of the performance objectives. I had no idea if the p&l numbers were changed or not although I originally believed they were. I went on to state "I" would not have them in which you attacked me saying that it would be absurd not to have p&l objectives. You then asked me why they would back guys who risked 1500 to make a dollar or some fucking joke like that. I went into a long explanation why "I" would do that. So one minute you are for the profit objectives then you are against them after you were for them but not really. Are you sure you are not a vendor? You sure as fuck sound like one.
That's not teaching !
You can't argue with stupid. There is a reason he schills for them so much.
I'm just curious.
So when you went live what were your parameters compared to your combines?
.
None of that is about teaching someone to trade. It's the same BS that brett steenbarger has put out for years and I really like the guy. That new age touchy feely stuff is not teaching guys how to trade, it's about everything else. I think there probably is some value out there for that stuff, but not for new traders. TST is not "teaching" guys a method. They are not showing you how to spread futures. They are not showing you how to write your own algos. They are not teaching you how to trade around economic reports or how to properly do a legit backtest. Those items would be teaching. They are trying to make the traders feel self confident. I think all that stuff is bullshit because what makes traders feel confident is making money, not thinking happy thoughts. I think TST is wasting their time with that garbage but I stand by what I said, they are definitely NOT teaching guys to trade. And I challenge anyone, anyone on this site to come forward and show me evidence where they are showing guys a fully developed methodology for making money in the markets. Telling guys to write a journal is not teaching. LOL.
Is that spineless shill Maverick still bullshitting here? You would think if one works for a company, at least he would learn about their product... 
But I guess he fits right in with their misrepresentation.
Posters like him should be banned, just like stealth vendors, because that is what he is,technically speaking. I don't mind if a person defends a product/company, but that should be based on facts and logical reasoning.
So I can see Mav going the Surf way, first on my Ignore, then being banned. Good riddance....
----------------------------------------------
Now going back to the title question, I don't even care if the coaches are not that great of a traders. I think the question should be: How profitable are the Live traders in the long run? On average, not very, because I would say about half (my guesstimate) never builds a cushion thus never gets a paycheck from TST before failing.
There is an inherent problem with TST's backing business model, namely, very good traders simply just won't stick around. Did you guys know that a Live trader getting a "150K account" starts out with 1 car??? Really? Yes, really. And why can't anybody do the same with a small account and build it up?
So if I am a very good trader who can slowly build up my account, I don't need TST, and if they actually give you 5-10-15 cars eventually, I won't stick around once I made a decent amount and I can start to trade for myself.
And that is why they don't have traders making more than a pizza delivery driver. But trading for TST is easier on your car, I have to give them that...
But I guess he fits right in with their misrepresentation.
Posters like him should be banned, just like stealth vendors, because that is what he is,technically speaking. I don't mind if a person defends a product/company, but that should be based on facts and logical reasoning.
So I can see Mav going the Surf way, first on my Ignore, then being banned. Good riddance....
----------------------------------------------
Now going back to the title question, I don't even care if the coaches are not that great of a traders. I think the question should be: How profitable are the Live traders in the long run? On average, not very, because I would say about half (my guesstimate) never builds a cushion thus never gets a paycheck from TST before failing.
There is an inherent problem with TST's backing business model, namely, very good traders simply just won't stick around. Did you guys know that a Live trader getting a "150K account" starts out with 1 car??? Really? Yes, really. And why can't anybody do the same with a small account and build it up?
So if I am a very good trader who can slowly build up my account, I don't need TST, and if they actually give you 5-10-15 cars eventually, I won't stick around once I made a decent amount and I can start to trade for myself.
And that is why they don't have traders making more than a pizza delivery driver. But trading for TST is easier on your car, I have to give them that...
Quote from Pekelo:
Is that spineless shill Maverick still bullshitting here? You would think if one works for a company, at least he would learn about their product...
But I guess he fits right in with their misrepresentation.
Posters like him should be banned, just like stealth vendors, because that is what he is,technically speaking. I don't mind if a person defends a product/company, but that should be based on facts and logical reasoning.
So I can see Mav going the Surf way, first on my Ignore, then being banned. Good riddance....
Great post. Now his comeback will be to insult you.