Quote from austinp:
<i>"Why do you need ma's to define trend? It either is making lower lows and lower highs or higher highs and higher lows or it isn't. No MA's necessary."</i>
On any intraday chart, what did the ES do today between 11:30am and 1:30pm EST?
Higher lows, higher highs and potential double-bottom. Now, those points are always relevant: highs and lows compared to what? Session extremes? Most recent 1,2,3 swings?
A lot of trend days are interspersed with wedges or flags that appear to be higher high - lower low reversal points. And, reversal days often look like budding trend days until these same patterns blossom.
Highs and lows are too relative a term. Any definition of such can be shown countless examples of where they failed and reversed.
*
All of the energy was downside, all day. Lifts were feeble, drops had all the emphasis. Plenty of tech-analysis tools confirmed downside trend intact, although at some point a -42 point decline is tough to keep shorting into.
Nevertheless, long was wrong all day. If longs were taken, had to keep your head on a swivel with those sell signals measuring next potential entry at all times.