To be a great trader you need some talent, granted, but to be a run of the mill PM at a fund or a market maker at a bank is a learned skill. Harvard graduate has an advantage there, as the school gives you good quantitative background and, most importantly, the skills needed to learn things independently. While it's very pleasant for the majority on this forum to cheer wildly when a Harvard graduate fails, overall Harvard-educated traders definitely outperform them. Same goes for the quantitative skills - while it's possible to be a good trader without any knowledge of math and stats (especially if you are a macro style guy), people with quantitative backgrounds certainly do better in trading then ex-marines and ex-plumbers.Quote from bone:
Just because you can tie a Windsor Knot and you edited the Harvard campus rag does not mean the markets will bow before you in deference.
they CERTAINLY do that's for CERTAIN, and that fact is derived from my quantitative background based on the kind of research I learned at Harvard after an exhaustive testing of trading skills of all ex-marines and ex-plumbers. Although to be fair, some of the ex-marines blew up up their accounts just because they were trained to blow things up. But you are CERTAINLY correct, I'm glad a poster with quantitative skills shows us how to come up with a CERTAINTY because there are so few in life.Quote from sle:
To be a great trader you need some talent, granted, but to be a run of the mill PM at a fund or a market maker at a bank is a learned skill. Harvard graduate has an advantage there, as the school gives you good quantitative background and, most importantly, the skills needed to learn things independently. While it's very pleasant for the majority on this forum to cheer wildly when a Harvard graduate fails, overall Harvard-educated traders definitely outperform them. Same goes for the quantitative skills - while it's possible to be a good trader without any knowledge of math and stats (especially if you are a macro style guy), people with quantitative backgrounds certainly do better in trading then ex-marines and ex-plumbers.
Quote from bumblebuzzard:
I also studied philosophy, and I don't know nothing about nothing else, except a little about trading.
I did, though, spend a lot of time shooting craps, and that built up a really good intuition about probability. (I'm serious.)
Quote from c.chugani:
How many people here WITHOUT backgrounds in maths, finance, banking, economics, statistics, computer programming or engineering have developed a succesful approach to trading that delivers consistent profits over time?
Appreciate your comments.
Quote from austinp:
no one needs quantative skills... everyone needs cognitive skills and most importantly, self-management skills.
Quote from oldtime:
they CERTAINLY do that's for CERTAIN, and that fact is derived from my quantitative background based on the kind of research I learned at Harvard after an exhaustive testing of trading skills of all ex-marines and ex-plumbers. Although to be fair, some of the ex-marines blew up up their accounts just because they were trained to blow things up. But you are CERTAINLY correct, I'm glad a poster with quantitative skills shows us how to come up with a CERTAINTY because there are so few in life.
