Yes...ok...good point...but lets look deeper...what if it were not a newbie and he ranked the trade?
now there is a monster thread for this.--are good traders better gamblers?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=47844-...---what say you!
now there is a monster thread for this.--are good traders better gamblers?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=47844-...---what say you!
Quote from ess1096:
I'll use an example to show why I believe the "MYTH" that risk management is #1 priority..
Tony Oz, in the book "The Stock Trader", made a profit of $16,000 + in four weeks trading a $50, 000 account. A 32.55% return in a month.(he didn't compound either) He made 116 trades, 75 winners & 41 losers. He used a trading plan based on support and resistance and always knew where he wanted to get out if the trade went wrong.
Now, suppose some newbie entered the market with a $50,000 account at the exact same time as Tony and he "speculated" that the QQQ (symbol at the time) was overbought. Mr. Newbie puts ALL $50,000, his entire account in a single short position of QQQ. Newbie would have made a hell of a profit in those four weeks. Much more than Tony Oz did with his well thought out plan.
Now, to the OP's question, is the newbie a better trader than Tony Oz just because he made more money? I think not.

